With respect to future technologies, it's not enshrined in the legislation.Oakshott and Windsor seem to have helped to secure standardised pricing to all locations. Good if you live in the bush, I guess.
The usual pairing arrangements were used where parliamentarians were not in the house.Does anyone know what happened?
Windsor on 6pm with George Negus had a few pearlers.Having listened to some of the proceedings on ABC Radio National yesterday, Messers Oakshott and Windsor won't be changing sides anytime soon.
Windsor on 6pm with George Negus had a few pearlers.
He mentioned there was no chance of switching sides to the coalition until Abbott actually stood for something.
He also noted he would review his support when Turnbull takes over as leader. Had to chuckle, but also live in hope that the Libs actually elect a leader people can feasibly consider as an alternate PM.
Agree. They are milking their positions for all they're worth.Both Independents are publicity seekers who want to be loved.
I don't think you'll find much disagreement on this, but if the Libs were to change leaders, who do you think would be better? This is the difficulty.Tony Abbott fought a good election, but I can't see how he can take the Coalition any further. There are a lot of voters out there who have no trouble voting Coalition but reckon he's neither fluent, tactical or tricky enough to put the red headed cheat on the deck.
They have too much at stake to jump, even if they were politically so inclined which they're not. If another election were held, they would both lose their jobs imo.I don't see either Independent jumping ship, but they might just go down with it.
Windsor is clearly labor at heart and would also prefer to have the more labor friendly Turnbull as opposition leader.
Abbott may not be the most suitable in some areas, but he is standing up for the views of many Aussies who do not want Gillard's dictatorial ideas or taxes. I don't believe Turnbull would represent the conservative masses sufficiently.
Just outa interest...if Turnbull was to lead the coalition into the next election would you vote for him?
if you couldn't, who/what party would be a realistic alternative for you and the conservative masses.?
I can't speak for the conservative masses, but can only hope the coalition don't do anything so stupid...lol. I certainly wouldn't be voting labor or greens.
And to vote for a minor party would only have preferences going to the libs so that wouldn't work. So, I really don't know...Hope I don't have to make that decision...
so cynical: agree with you can not vote abbott nor would I vote for a mullah; same same in my opinion, would vote turnbull
so cynical: agree with you can not vote abbott nor would I vote for a mullah; same same in my opinion, would vote turnbull
Yes, yes, Turnbull is a Mullah therefore what we want is a nice respectable ex JP Morganite, he's sure to do right by us
What is the 'mullah' you both refer to?
Wikipedia advises it is a muslim.
I am missing the relevance.
A Mad monk is as close as your going to get to a 'Mullah' in Australian politics.
^ This was the point i was trying to make ^
The bulk of the the conservative masses have nowhere else to go and any vote that did go further to the right would simply flow (2 party preferred) back to the coalition anyway.
With 1 vote Tony as leader the coalition gets only maybe 45% of the centre vote, with Turnbull as leader i reckon they will get 50% or more and thus win Government....seems a no brainier to me.
The school surveyed 380 of its students and found they were prodigious internet users, with 99.5 per cent of them on Facebook. But year 11 student Alex Klammer believes the $35.9 billion broadband network is a waste of money.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?