Currently I haven't implemented anything in place however...<snip>
Ok. But implement something until you refine your exit idea. This is just basic capital preservation.
2.How are you determining your worst case exit strategy?
I believe this is answered in the above case.
Have a think about what you will do if something changes and it still hasn't fallen to your worst case price. The initial stop, however it's determined, should be the worst case. There are times when there is no longer a reason to stay in a share but it still hasn't hit your initial stop. Will you exit straight away or wait?
3.When will you get out of a stock?
Trailing loss or a better opportunity comes along, although i do plan to try and stay carry free with my high risk.
Ok.
4.What kind of position sizing model are you using to determine how much to
invest in each stock?
Not exactly sure what you mean could you explain about a position sizing model.
There are different ways of determining how many units you will buy in each stock. 4 commonly used ones are:
1) Fixed dollar amount - eg. you might allocate $10,000 per share.
2) Fixed percent amount - eg. 10% of total equity to each investment
3) Fixed dollar risk - you determine how much you are prepared to lose in dollars and then buy X units based on that
4) Fixed percent risk - you decide how many % of total equity you are prepared to lose then buy X units based on that.
1 and 2 are self-explanatory. 3 and 4 may need a little more explaining. They are both calculated on your total equity (cash + value of open positions) - though some traders may just use cash + purchase price of open positions.
Assume you have $50,000 cash and no open positions. With model 3 you might decide you will risk $500 per investment. Take the intended purchase price less the intended initial stop. Say, XYZ, buy at $3.00, worst case exit at $2.50 = $0.50. So if it falls by 50c you want to lose no more than $500. That means you can afford to buy 500/0.50 = 1000 shares => 1000 x 0.50 = $500 risked
Model 4 works similarly except you calculate a percent of total equity. For example, you might decide to risk 2% on each investment. To use the above example: 2% x $50k = $1000. 50c risk on each share. So 1000/0.50 = 2000 units.
In reality there are variations on these ideas and in some cases you might use more than one of them at different times. Each have advantages and disadvantages.
Sadly, many investors/traders have no idea and just throw whatever seems good at the time into the purchase.
6.What kind of overall money management model are you using?
Other one I'm not 100% certain what your on about
The position sizing examples used above should be employed in the context of an overall strategy. For example, will you deploy 100% of capital if you have sufficient buy signals? Or will you always hold back a portion in cash, say 20%? Will you contain portfolio heat? Heat is the total amount of equity at risk, or how much you lose if all your stops are hit. Example, say you use a %risk position sizing model, you have 10 open trades with 1% risked on each. If all your stops are hit over say a month then your heat is 10%. You will be down $5000 in that case. You might like to calculate the worst overall hit you are prepared to take and then build your position sizing model around that. For instance say you want no more than 5% at risk at any one time. That would mean you could buy 5 different stocks with 1% risk on each. Just examples here, not suggestions. You need to figure out your risk tolerance and plan accordingly.
unsure how i will deal with my dividend based part of the portfolio.
In this environment especially, there is no such thing as a safe bet. IMO, you need to decide up front at what point you will accept you are wrong and exit a falling share.
And most importantly, if you don't know how you are going to get out of an investment before you actually buy it, then you have no business entering - that is not investing, it's gambling.
Just my thoughts.