So_Cynical
The Contrarian Averager
- Joined
- 31 August 2007
- Posts
- 7,467
- Reactions
- 1,469
Yep...they don't have stop loss orders etc, so you will have to manage your positions/trades manually, which for me is no big deal thou it may not suit some....AustSuper say they don't want account holders to "trade" or try and "time the market".I have just registered and having a look at the platform. I can see no provision for stop losses or for buy stop orders - entry appears to be by limit or market orders only. Is this your understanding?
thx
I'm lost, where do the 500k-600k of stocks on top of the 250k come from ?
If you were at age pension age, and had your assets in an allocated pension you wouldn't be paying tax.
I know at one stage complying annuities meant the value of same were not taken into account when being assessed for a government pension but I thought that had changed. Not sure.
I'd be interested to know what attracts you to the term annuity? Maybe the 'set and forget' aspect?
I am surprised you would risk the share market for a hopeful 6% dividend as opposed to guaranteed bank interest of 6% for term deposits.
I'm also a bit confused here.
SC, if you have approaching $500K-$600K of stocks outside of Super, isn't any gain here going to attract tax at your marginal rate?
Given that your main focus seems to be on providing for your retirement (and good on you for this), I'm a bit puzzled about why you wouldn't have the lot in Super, with tax at just 15% in the accumulation phase.
If you have $250,000 plus around $600,000, it would be extremely tax effective to put it all into a SMSF, the running of which would also be cost effective at around $850K.
Even if the $500K - $600K and/or the $250K is aspirational at this stage, I'm finding it hard to understand why you wouldn't have any assets inside Super.
My personal portfolio currently at 24 stocks, a mix of open positions and part free carry positions, some with multiple entry's to build the free carry component and yield...current PA growth of around 12%Originally Posted by village idiot
I'm lost, where do the 500k-600k of stocks on top of the 250k come from ?
I've had the same impressionSo_C.. how old are you? (Apologies in advance for the personal nature of this question and please feel free not to answer).
To me you've always come across as reasonably young (i.e. not close to the usual retirement age) and I've always thought your goal to retire in 10 years is to retire well before that usual retirement age...
This is what I don't get. If you set up a SMSF you have considerably more control than you have at present, don't you?Agree...and that's why ive decided to double my salary sacrifice and in all probability will add to it every year until im maxed out at 25K....im hesitant to sell stocks and throw a lump sum in because i will lose so much investment flexibility.
Within 2 or 3 years i can see that ill have to put all of my disposable income into super...but would only feel comfortable doing that if my personal portfolio was in tact, i spent to much of my life poor and struggling to just give up control of that money.
So_C.. how old are you? (Apologies in advance for the personal nature of this question and please feel free not to answer).
To me you've always come across as reasonably young (i.e. not close to the usual retirement age) and I've always thought your goal to retire in 10 years is to retire well before that usual retirement age...
It's totally your business, of course, but I just can't understand why you wouldn't have a SMSF which gives you total control over all your investments in a tax advantaged vehicle, rather than putting up with the restrictions of the public superfund you are apparently using now.
So_Cynical, what is your plan of action with GFF? You must be very happy with the 33% jump today?It was only a matter of time when an offer like that was forthcoming, the company was so cheap and an overseas buyer sees the value, good luck mate, hope you make few $$$.
i had IMF SLX and BPT short listed and totally went the wrong way
Thanks for putting up your results, SC.
How do you think you'd be feeling about your system if you were using larger amounts and having to generate an income you could live off? i.e. no salary or other income to back up your investing/trading.
Would you then significantly change what you're doing in order to generate a consistent profit?
What would you do differently?
(Not meaning to be intrusive or put you on the spot: just genuinely interested .)
Interesting read - thanks SC! I'm also in IMF and quite like this company. Very low P/E, but seems to be improving every year! Happy to hold for awhile, and a nice 10c dividend announced today.
Hope all goes well with the retirement plans. Whereabouts are you in Malaysia?
I think i do consider risk but just go about it in a different way...i take calculated risks because i am chasing higher returns so have to put my capital "at risk" the statistics from my non super trading/investment activities prove that my strategy is profitable...its the only weapon i have at my disposal.
Capital preservation means either no risk (TD,s etc) or stop losses which i see as micro non capital preservation, death by a 1000 cuts...i like to think of what im doing as a business and in a business would accepting consistent small losses be acceptable? would an ice cream salesman with 10 ice creams lose money selling 7 ice creams in the hope of getting back the losses on selling the other 3?
Id rather (feel more comfortable) selling all the ice creams for a profit...or at-least trying to.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?