New all time high and close for MTU. Interesting in light of the carnage, plunge and whipsawing posts of the last page or so.
Obviously there’s now anticipation of a good result – which if it occurs would be quite impressive considering the integration tasks they have on their plate.
Really interesting and I must be missing something. Maybe the record results announced today were already factored in... MTU hits $7.27 and then slides to around $6.81 at the moment.
Beyond my comprehension like most of the market.....
I admit, I am having a bit of trouble understanding the parts that I have bolded. The last of the bolds seems to be contradicting the first two. Can you please try to explain it again or rephrase it, if it isn't much trouble?I have a funny feeling the board feels that the share price is overvalued and are issuing shares because its cheaper than using existing cash flow and/or existing debt facilities. But in saying that, if my opinion is correct, at the end of the day the board is still stiffing the MTU shareholders by issuing shares at over inflated prices.
Speaking on long term fundamentals for MTU... the biggest concern I have with this company is its acquisitions. While most of the acquisitions make sense, the way they purchase these companies doesn't make too much sense (IMO).
They have almost added 100 million new shares since FY2008.
If they limited the issuing of shares EPS could be north of 50c now...
I have a funny feeling the board feels that the share price is overvalued and are issuing shares because its cheaper than using existing cash flow and/or existing debt facilities. But in saying that, if my opinion is correct, at the end of the day the board is still stiffing the MTU shareholders by issuing shares at over inflated prices.
anyone else have opinions on the acquisition strategies?
In the majority of cases the upcoming results are evident in the price action way before the masses are informed.
anyone else have opinions on the acquisition strategies?
Boggo, is this statement backed by ancedotes or through your own research with supporting statistics?
We've all heard this before but there's no doubt that there are earning surprises all the time that create large moves on reporting day. If one was to take these large moves into account I am unsure whether the result is always "priced in" by preceeding action.
P.S. May not be the right thread to discuss this in detail, so if you are sharing your research or view, a new thread might be a better place.
Thanks
Boggo, is this statement backed by ancedotes or through your own research with supporting statistics?
We've all heard this before but there's no doubt that there are earning surprises all the time that create large moves on reporting day. If one was to take these large moves into account I am unsure whether the result is always "priced in" by preceeding action.
P.S. May not be the right thread to discuss this in detail, so if you are sharing your research or view, a new thread might be a better place.
Thanks
Having said the acquisition strategy has added value I would also like it to take a rest here (debt financing is pretty fully utilised) and the focus to turn for a while totally towards extracting the organic growth and efficiencies available within existing operations.
In the majority of cases the upcoming results are evident in the price action way before the masses are informed.
Boggo, is this statement backed by ancedotes or through your own research with supporting statistics?
We've all heard this before but there's no doubt that there are earning surprises all the time that create large moves on reporting day. If one was to take these large moves into account I am unsure whether the result is always "priced in" by preceeding action.
Just a brief reply with a couple of chart examples. Apart from MTU you could also look at the days leading up to the reports from AMP, FLT etc, actually many examples exist where you can get a heads up if you are monitoring your holdings or a watchlist closely in the lead up to reporting day.
Two examples (I went short on CCL at the turn). New thread may be needed if this warrants further discussion.
I thought the result was pretty good.
This offered a decent buying point for a few weeks just below $6.
It is a bit cheaper by my val. metrics than some of its peers - but it has a lot of work to do over the next couple of periods to integrate some of the acquisitions. This result to me looks like they will do pretty well over the next few reports if they manage to integrate well as they have in the past....
I got a few when it dipped below $6, but only a small position and didn't feel it was cheap enough to get set.
Now that it's dipped below into the red I've put the short on to see if hte weakness continues in the afternoon.
The full year guidance is unchanged by MTU.
I hope your short goes well, I'd like some for the portfolio if it can get to below ~$5.50 levels...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?