tinhat
Pocket Calculator Operator
- Joined
- 1 May 2009
- Posts
- 1,756
- Reactions
- 768
Maybe not.
Renounceable entitlement offers don’t dilute shareholders because shareholders have the chance to participate in proportion to their current holdings.
There is no shares being sold to the vendors or offered to institutional investors via placement etc.
A current shareholder may be diluted, but only if they sell their entitlements for which they will receive compensation or fail to take any action at all.
I don’t see how people think a renounceable entitlement offer is dilution so I am probably not answering your question at all – If you give me something specific, I will clarify.
Page 7 of the offer booklet states that the rights will be traded on the ASX from the 18th April to the 4th May. How does this work?
I'm interested in buying entitlement rights. I owned MTU until I got stopped out last year. Never bought back in but I'm impressed with this company.
Interestingly, the M2 website seems to be down for me at the moment.
[edit]
OK I read further on, so stock owners can instruct their broker to put their entitlement (or a portion) onto the market. I assume that the ASX will issue a temporary code for these? Am I right in assuming that people can buy the entitlement rights on the ASX and will then have to write a cheque to the offer manager for the actual amount of the shares ($2.66) or will that be rolled up into the purchase of the entitlements; ie, you buy the entitlement and pay for the share all via the ASX trade?
If they are using the money raised to buy something that is earnings accretive it is also not delusionary, I mean dilutionary.
Thats what I was trying to get at - The only way there is no dilution is if the acquisition is EPS accretive and in my entire life I’ve not seen many of those.
time will tell I suppose ...
MTU is certainly having an OK day today [atm anyway].... Up 4% while XAO up 1.2%. There seem to be pleny of buyers.
If you buy MTU today, do you get the rights option?
Just a question about the rights issue. They do not appear in my holdings with either of my brokers, (i hold in my SMSF and personal accounts)
I have not filled out the form to trade options I wonder if this makes a difference?
Does anyone know the code for the options?
Just a question about the rights issue. They do not appear in my holdings with either of my brokers, (i hold in my SMSF and personal accounts)
I have not filled out the form to trade options I wonder if this makes a difference?
Does anyone know the code for the options?
I think the main question in regards to this expansion is: Do you think they will be able to win (or even keep) market share against the other (bigger) players?Another thing about the acquisition is that Primus has a retail business and MTU have not been in the retail space until now.
I don't own MTU, and haven't really planned on buying any. But this acquisition doesn't look all that great on paper.
They're essentially paying $183m for a company that earned a profit of $10.3m. If you can believe the synergies (at $5m a year) that's $15m added to the bottom line. You could argue that this increases their customer base and that they gain infrastructure. Perhaps they can drag some added hidden earnings out of Primus.
My calculations are that equity will be around $185m after this acquisition (I haven't added the DRP back either) and that profit will be around $39m (or $43m will amortisation).
ROE will be around 20% (or 23% if you add back the amortisation costs).
Revenue looks fairly flat and it looks like their NPAT has seen an increase by increasing gross sales margins more than anything over the last two years (did they change their business model?). Cost reduction and synergies are short term earnings drivers in my opinion.
It looks feasible that the higher ROE (mid to high 20s) of the past was due to a high period of business growth and it is becoming harder to sustain as the company grows its revenue base.
Am I missing something?
Thanks - I am not 100% sure that I follow. But is this the reason for the difference between NPAT of 10.4m compared to FCF of $15.4m?Identifiable intangible asset. aka customer contract valuations created from change of control transactions.
Transaction accounting creates valuations for customer contracts which have to be amortised.Thanks - I am not 100% sure that I follow. But is this the reason for the difference between NPAT of 10.4m compared to FCF of $15.4m?
Therefore - they receive cash payment in advance of having to recognise revenue on the operating statement?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?