- Joined
- 7 November 2007
- Posts
- 312
- Reactions
- 0
Any other MMX holders wish they had never had a go at MIS??
I really wish they would just p*ss them off and let them fight with the WA govt over a rail line.
...and how about that release from MIS today, it looked like a Liberal party ad with big red letters all over it!?:
MIS really look like they are slagging off MMX, and they are still raving about their share price doing "so well".
Arghhh... I wish Mr. Kopetjka never went down there!
Murchison is currently preparing a detailed announcement which will contain information supporting Murchison’s resource potential of 375 million tonnes from the Jack Hills Project. This announcement is expected to be issued before the close of trading tomorrow (22 November 2007) ...
Murchison currently expects to be in a position to release an updated JORC compliant resource statement during the week commencing Monday 26 November 2007.
Either way, MMX WILL come back to record highs at some point hopefully soonish
The 58% increase in JORC compliant mineral reserves at Jack Hills announced today has had little effect on halting this share price slide. Might have something to do with the MIS announcement that the company was in 'Discussions with Interested Parties' (ie most likely NOT MMX).
I have seen the buy recommendations and the $7+ broker valuations but I am starting to become nervous. The market just seems to really dislike this stock at the moment. As one of the silly few who jumped in well above $5 not long ago is it time to bail out or stick to my guns?Does anyone see market sentiment turning on this one in the short term?
Date: 8/11/2007
Author: Paul Garvey
Source: The Australian Financial Review --- Page: 26
Murchison Metals is confident about its takeover bid for rival iron ore miner,Midwest Corporation. However, Midwest has revealed that Murchison has littlehope of gaining full control. Shareholders holding 45 per cent of its shareshave said that they will not accept the offer. Midwest's board is expectedto reject the bid. It holds concerns about the size of Murchison'sresources and the lack of synergies without full control
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?