- Joined
- 7 November 2007
- Posts
- 312
- Reactions
- 0
The very interesting thing about MKY is the (potential) size of the target. Wallys Cluster is 12x 12 kms as the "target" hi grade area. that is 144 sq kms. The rock type that has been identified as highly uraniferous is loveringite which is volcanic in nature. Speaking in a very speculative manner, there is potential that the highly uraniferous veins refered to in to-days report may come from a great depth. Assuming a "first pass" target depth of 500 meters, we have a block of rock that is absolutely massive in size and "may" be laced with veins of uranium. This is pure speculation on my part BUT (1) hi grade u rocks reported all over Wally's Cluster (2) first trenches identified as carrying hi grade u rocks (3) rocks are volcanic in nature and vein's may have come from a great depth.
This thing may at the end of the day be a complete dud (which is the downside risk) but there have been rumors circulating on the web that a JV might be coming and this may IMHO be due to the massive size of the target. This thing is completely different to your typical Aussie paleo channel deposit of a few hundred ppm per tonne. MKY is talking sample grades that top out at 45,000 ppm. and now they will be chasing a vein system of potentially very hi grade u. Watch for trenching grades and locations to follow shortly. Good luck to all longs.
Newbie,
I know exactly how you are feeling. At the moment the market depth indicates that the price should settle around 4 - 4.5 cents; of course that will depend on the holders sentiment at opening. There appears to still be interest from buyers.
Remeber, it's only a loss if you sell.
The announcement yesterday, while not having the "bonanza" grades confirmed was still quite positive so for me MKY becomes a longer term hold.
I welcome anyone else to offer their thoughts on the results and prospects for this one.
Sydneysider thanks for the analysis, appreciated and very informative indeed. The sell off after the announcement was huge though. What were shareholders expecting that obviously didn't happen that caused a drop of over 30% post announcement, I certainly didn't read anything in the announcement that would cause such a drastic turn of sentiment towards the stock. I know you believe the sell off was mis informed, my problem is understanding how shareholders deduced the announcement was negative enough to drop 30% as I can't see this, having read it many times.
I have owned for a while now and have had a few false dawns with this one but will be sitting on these as I believe the potential is huge with this stock
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?