Knobby22
Mmmmmm 2nd breakfast
- Joined
- 13 October 2004
- Posts
- 9,880
- Reactions
- 6,895
Mish, Mike Shedlock, still believes in private enterprise should have free reign and no regulation despite evidence to the contrary. Someone! Please invite him to Australia to see how things can work.
He even wants to privatise the USA police force, he blames governments for losing money in the downturn for the pensions funds and says they should be privatised. Gee, maybe Lehman brothers could run them.
His message is simple, obnoxius and shows what a retard he really is.
Mish: "The correct response would be to kill all unnecessary services, fire all the government workers and privatize everything remaining."
It's people like him that are destroying America.
His pathetic blog link follows.
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2009/10/five-major-pension-problems-one-simple.html
So you don't agree with Mick?
Mish: "The correct response would be to kill all unnecessary services, fire all the government workers and privatize everything remaining."
It's people like him that are destroying America.
There are certain things in society that should not be centred around a profit motive, that should only be done by government. But those things number much fewer than what the government is presently doing.
Knobby, this view actually sounds like anarcho-capitalism, and this is why political spectrum should never be considered points on a line.
I'd prefer those services to be run privately (unless we changed our political system to something that encourages efficiency) but as non-profit organisations, and subsidised when needed. Better still, we could get rid of our economic system altogether, hold hands and distribute all resources to where they're needed.
I occasionally deal with an organisation called Mainco, a privately owned monopoly that deals with assets of the Victorian railways.
Let me tell you that they are more inefficient than any government department. I had to threaten recently to get an answer within 3 months to a simple question. Because they are privately owned they charge my clients a fortune to do anything and then they do a crap lazy job. I lit a bridge recently next to a Mainco controlled Bridge, it took them 6 months to approve and charged the council involved $18,000. More than I charged to do the bridge design. Anyone else could have done it in two hours.
I am sure you can think of other organisations run as badly. I have to deal with them unfortunately
http://www.maincomelbourne.com/
Can you imagine a privately owned police force?
This could all be solved by income and employment based on performance. It's argued that this kind of inefficiency exists precisely because it's not up to the free market. There's hardly any accountability. It's as much a cultural problem as it is a problem of the system though, as there are countries where this sort of lazy attitude just does not exist, despite having a similar system.
And the price gouging would be more difficult to maintain
I will tell you anothe privatising disaster. Prisons.
They privatised a couple of Prisons in Victoria under PPP. What a disaster.
I will tell you anothe privatising disaster. Prisons.
They privatised a couple of Prisons in Victoria under PPP. What a disaster. Government had to take them back.
Somethings need to be run under close government scrutiny.
And people wonder why half the public, hate the conservatives guts come election day.
How is privatising everything "conservative"?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?