- Joined
- 7 December 2006
- Posts
- 254
- Reactions
- 0
I think it explains the recent run, but not Friday's action. Most of the reports I've seen about MCR put them at a value between 2.35 and 2.60, so I'm thinking we'll see them at about 2.50 before long.porkpie324 said:When trading resource stocks a sharp correction is always on the cards ie KZL (makes my eyes water at the mention). At the moment apart from some physical shares I'm out of MCR, I bought back into IGO & SMY using CFD's on Friday, MCR's trading late Friday was a suprise to me, but I read a report yesterday comparing IGO,MCR&SMY which does to a certain extent explain fridays MCR move, I was also expecting a larger nickel LME correction on the outcome of the dispute at Sudbury on the labour settlement, another reason why I closed most of my positions on Weds & Thurs.
BTW if anyone is interested in reading the mentioned report I found it on the Mincor website(mincor.com.au) under investor relations. porkpie
Yes, you did.Now this is the only time I remember mentioning something being overbought on RSI and look what happened... It pulled back I got it VERY wrong didn't I??? have a look at the weekly chart and you will see it touched 80 as well and dropped off. The monthly is still in well overbought territory.
So if anyone listened to what I said and waited a few days they would have bought in at perhaps up to an 20% discount....
Tony.
You said this at $2.50, and again at $3. If they had listened to you, they would have lost by now. After your prediction of $2, the lowest they have gone is ~ $2.50. I doubt they would have got in at all, thinking it was going lower. And by the way, far from being overbought currently, it looks like breaking from above $3.20. When there is panic buying (as there is with nickel) using a retroactively correct indicator like a monthly RSI is about a month too late and useless.wintermute said:I just looked at the 5 year monthly chart, and RSI is showing it is way overbought.... weekly is edging its way towards overbought too... when MRE did this it had a massive pullback... thinking about taking my 2.31 bid out now, as we may even see it pull back to $2.00.... The latest nickel prices have gone up very very quickly, could see a pull back on those, and if that happens panic might set in... still might be a chance to get some at a bargain price
Uh uh. At the time you posted MCR dipped to just below 2.50 intraday. They would have lost because they most likely would have had to buy in higher than what they sold. Anyone can pick a dip. I can say a stock looks overbought, and retrospectively say, "oh there it was". I can say that about almost every stock out there. And I doubt you truly picked it anyway as your order never got filled. That's a pretty clear indication to me.Hmmm I didn't go back to the previous posts (as I didn't remember back that far). the first one was at $2.75 approx if you look at the chart not $2.50...
So if my using RSI to predict a pull-back was VERY wrong I'd like to know whyAnyone who would not buy on the dip after the pull-back, would likely have sold at a loss if they bought at $3.00 and then had it pull back to $2.60. so I don't see your point...
It seems you are bitter about my posts on MCR and saying I thought it would pull back which it subsequently did. I can't understand why. If using RSI is a month too late, how come I picked it a week before the event??
Anyway I only posted because the tone of your initial post on the XAO thread seemed pretty hostile, and I wasn't sure why...... It would appear you feel that my posts on MCR have affected your (or someone else's) decisions on what to do with MCR, in a negative way. If that is the case then I apologise as that is the last thing I want when writing posts. I think I need to put the sig on that I have on another forum! will do so now
Cheers
Tony.
Definitely.My look at the RSI when combined with other indicators is telling me that this is pretty bullish at the moment and it will most probably break through the short term resistance in this ascending triangle. Looks like a pretty good set up actually for a significant break up.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?