LVL - LV Living

mime · 8 June 2005

Re: LVL

You'll find current retirees are cashed up because of the prop boom. I feel for you looseing 50% or so but you shouldn't hyped the stock up in public.

krisbarry · 8 June 2005

Re: LVL

mime said:
You'll find current retirees are cashed up because of the prop boom.

I like the sound of this, maybe that is LVL's life-line.

"Callin' all cashed up retirees....is it time to retire yet?"

mime · 8 June 2005

Re: LVL

Their is a shortage of nursing homes not retirement homes.

krisbarry · 8 June 2005

Re: LVL

mime said:
Their is a shortage of nursing homes not retirement homes.

What support do you have to this claim?

I was under the impression that both were in demand

mime · 8 June 2005

Re: LVL

If they are both in demand why hasn't your stock gone up?

It's logic. The damand is for homes with aged care on staff. That's the main reason they relocate from their current homes. If they don't need to be looked after why move?

krisbarry · 8 June 2005

Re: LVL

mime said:
If they are both in demand why hasn't your stock gone up?

It's logic. The damand is for homes with aged care on staff. That's the main reason they relocate from their current homes. If they don't need to be looked after why move?

I was looking for some hard evidence from you such as news reports, news articles, research etc. Not just simply stating something that may or may not be true.

I have read and seen many articles that state demand for retirement villages is on the rise, Australia wide.

LVL is not on the rise ATM for the simple fact they need to increase their revenue/profits for a share price rise. Their next profit outlook will be released this week.

The reason retirees relocate to retirement villages is simple

1) The have no need for a large family home, so they sell and downsize.
2) Feel safer in a village style environment
3) Want to be with people of similar age
4) Do not want to die alone
5) Accommodation, Meals, On-site Doctor visits, Outings etc are organised
6) Want a quiet/peaceful place to enjoy their later years
7) Parents may decide that it would be a better option than to live alone
8) Villages are desinged for easy access, not as dangerous as a family home.
9) They may be quite healthy and just looking for a change of lifestyle
10) A Village may be less maintenance and up-keep than a family home
11) Seems to be the Australian way...we are not as family orientated

etc etc

mime · 8 June 2005

Re: LVL

I'm not going to search for everdence for you because there probably isn't any. I've only seen reports for aged care.

These guys are devlopers right? For housing? I'm pretty sure people are turned off real estate right now. Maybe things will be different for LVL in 5 to 10 years time but by then the company may not be around.

krisbarry · 9 June 2005

Re: LVL

mime said:
I'm not going to search for everdence for you because there probably isn't any. I've only seen reports for aged care.

These guys are devlopers right? For housing? I'm pretty sure people are turned off real estate right now. Maybe things will be different for LVL in 5 to 10 years time but by then the company may not be around.

Mime, your response sounds very negative and un-educated. Will no longer take your advice seriously, all the best K

krisbarry · 9 June 2005

Re: LVL

RichKid said:
It's always very risky going against the trend.

...And I have also heard of those that buy what others don't want, hold and wait for an upward trend...that is what I am doing with LVL.

mime · 9 June 2005

Re: LVL

krisbarry said:
Mime, your response sounds very negative and un-educated. Will no longer take your advice seriously, all the best K

No my response is realistic and I'm taking a conservative view to the stock. Your taking an optimistic view which is what Alan Bond did to alot of idiot investors who lost the lot.

I'm lucky I didn't listen to you when you pumped this stock up or I'd be loosing around 60%.

I'm not a uni student and I'm a limited academic but I have years of experience in the stock market(I'm 20, started at 12). I've lost alot but I've also gained alot. It's called experience and obviously something you don't have. I've managed to build a tidy amount of capital from trading.

gl trading your way into the black from LVL's losses. I'm sure you will be fine without my help.

krisbarry · 10 June 2005

Re: LVL

Mime, I think we will have to agree to disagree on this one.

krisbarry · 10 June 2005

Re: LVL

All set for the Yield Management Business to take off.

LV Living will acquire a 51% interest in LV Living Yield, at a cost of $1.22 mil.

The business launched fully in April 2005, with forecasted revenue of $5.3 million and net profit of $2.8 million for the year to June 30, 2006

Also note “RewardsCorp” business and retail promotion with Retravision in Queensland.

For Additional Info. See Announcement made 1:44pm 10/6/05 EST on ASX

http://www.asx.com.au/asx/statistics/todayAnnHeaders.jsp?

Should be interesting to see how the market reacts to his news.

LVL Shares up 0.3 cents to 4.3 cents

serp · 10 June 2005

Re: LVL

mime said:
I'm not a uni student and I'm a limited academic but I have years of experience in the stock market(I'm 20, started at 12).

I didn't realise you could trade shares legally under the age of 18

Aussiejeff · 10 June 2005

Re: LVL

krisbarry,

Hehe. Fingers x'ed on this one. This share is purely "a bit on the side" for me. As you know I bought in at 5.1c so am hoping the announced capital raising at 6c per share holds up..... if not - cest la vie! I can afford to sit on it till the cows come home... it only represents 1.5% of my share portfolio.

The announcement is timely though, that is for sure!

Cheers,

AJ

mime · 10 June 2005

Re: LVL

serp said:
I didn't realise you could trade shares legally under the age of 18

Trust account under parents name.

krisbarry · 11 June 2005

Re: LVL

Aussiejeff said:
krisbarry,

Hehe. Fingers x'ed on this one. This share is purely "a bit on the side" for me. As you know I bought in at 5.1c so am hoping the announced capital raising at 6c per share holds up..... if not - cest la vie! I can afford to sit on it till the cows come home... it only represents 1.5% of my share portfolio.

The announcement is timely though, that is for sure!

Cheers,

AJ

Fingers X'ed for sure. Hopefully it goes ahead, as they have continued to make plans and backed out of them at the last minute.

krisbarry · 14 June 2005

Re: LVL

Seems like the market liked the idea of taking up a 51% of the Yield Management Business, shares in LVL up 0.7 cents to 5 cents or 16.3%

krisbarry · 16 June 2005

Re: LVL

Intended Buyers Building and a little activity this morning. Hopefully good news ahead.

markrmau · 20 June 2005

Re: LVL

Doesn't look like management of LVL are interested in keeping the market fully informed. Todays announcement should have been marked price sensitive and should have been announced far earlier.

krisbarry · 21 June 2005

Re: LVL

markrmau, would have to agree with you on this one. Price sensitive that is for sure. Someone just dumped 2 million, but it was quickly snapped up, so maybe the news aint all that bad.

LVL - LV Living

Similar threads

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency