- Joined
- 10 June 2007
- Posts
- 4,045
- Reactions
- 1,404
Hi Joules,
You make a relevant point that needs to be considered when playing with small speccies. In theory and at a basic level, the more shares on offer, the more can leak as 'sells' and keep the SP run from accelerating.
However, remember the following key points (following on from Chasero's relevant comments):
1. In Lakes Oil's case, many of the shares are in the hands of long term holders (it is the oldest explorere still going on the ASX). These guys buy in SPPs and add to their holdings. Some of the directors and 'old guard' still hold many while Armour hold quite a chunk.
This is seen in the SP rise. Despite 7b shares on offer, the SP has risen from .004c to .009c since January. A rise of 125% in 4 months is still good SP action.
2. When Wombat-4 drilled last time, the SP rose from .004c to .016c. While I am not saying this will happen again (although it could do so and much more if Morey and/or Holdgate are successful), it shows that the shares on offer are not a huge issue.
3. If Wombat or Holdgate came off as winners, I would think that LKO's market capital would be very cheap at current prices.
With this in mind, it is no wonder that LKO has risen.
Cheers,
BESBS
point 1, shares in the hands of longterm holders doesnt mean what you think, only that youre choosing to see that longterm as being in your favour, whereas, longterm is often holding onto hope for a lot of them,so, soon as price begins to lift theyre more likely to exit at 'best' price available so they dont get stuck any longer and many will see how much they can get back not how much they can make...shares in the hands of longterm holders are just as unlikely to buy more because of the spp's, not supporting the bid side adding to the sell side
point 2 (purely debateable)......the market cap is only of investment grade when divided by the number of stocks issued, at 7 billion compared to peers or even lesser non-producers, how is lko an investment grade? What exactly would the sp need to be to make it attractive to instos?
point 3 aside from the recent rise in price, where is the evidence that there has been a substantial demand in the stock prior to it lifting? where are the footprints of the smart money? would 400 million stock attract fast liquidity or would a 7 billion stock attract the same people who move price ?
your points are good points, however, think as a trader whom is on the other side of your trade rather than just flying the "i'm already in super cheap" flag
it's a trade in an auction ......
i'm not a holder, never have...... if someone wants a stake in the play, Armour is a proposition to consider at 51%
while a huge dilution of value has limited real at-market bearing as a function on any given day, i think this is an important moment to consider risk as it actually exists
just ideas