- Joined
- 20 November 2010
- Posts
- 27
- Reactions
- 0
That's it you sinners you're all going to hell LOL
Religious leaders back carbon tax
Oh for god's sake, when we get down to babbling about what religious leaders say or think, we're really scraping the bottom of the barrel!
Given their nonsensical basis for existence in the first place, why on earth would anyone take any notice of what they think about anything????
Pathetic.
It's usually all smoke and mirrors with this whole nonsensical carbon tax thing. I didn't see all the news, but I am guessing that Gillard had a couple of "leaders" whom she has CONvinced of this nonsense.
I wonder just how "religious" these "leaders" really are if they think robbing one section of the community to pay another (+10% to the UN) is going to get religious blessing, they would have to be as luny as the PM and her cohorts, imo.
Is he suggesting interest rates rises will kill manufacturing before the carbon tax has an impact ?''Reserve Bank governor] Glenn Stevens made it quite clear that monetary policy would be run deliberately to squeeze out jobs and investment … in the rest of the economy as the resources sector expanded,'' he said.
''As a result manufacturing is shrinking and will shrink. The carbon pricing proposals that I've put forward will not cost any manufacturing jobs.''
That report by Garnaut was a very political document, blatantly so.What exactly is Ross Garnaut saying here,
Is he suggesting interest rates rises will kill manufacturing before the carbon tax has an impact ?
Interesting statement if he is. It's also interesting that he considers the RBA to be deliberately shrinking manufacturing.
http://www.theage.com.au/environmen...ost-garnaut-20110603-1fl4g.html#ixzz1OFxbAJbF
What exactly is Ross Garnaut saying here,
Is he suggesting interest rates rises will kill manufacturing before the carbon tax has an impact ?
Interesting statement if he is. It's also interesting that he considers the RBA to be deliberately shrinking manufacturing.
http://www.theage.com.au/environmen...ost-garnaut-20110603-1fl4g.html#ixzz1OFxbAJbF
The Reserve is one of the very few institutions in which it's still possible to have some faith.
Fairly obviously, their capacity to adequately carry out their role.Faith in what? Can you elaborate?
There are two things that annoy the hell out of me when Gillard & co. talk about this carbon tax :-
a) these cronies never use the correct term. It is always mentioned as a carbon tax instead of carbon dioxide tax. Perhaps carbon sounds more poisonous and it then becomes a mind thing to the naive. As we all know, the planet cannot survive without carbon dioxide, so why is this government trying reduce CO2.
b) If you are not prepared to accept a carbon dioxide tax, you are branded a DENIER.
LIES, LIES AND MORE LIES.
Nothing hard about understanding what "carbon pollution" is about....
A survey just conducted in the streets of Perth, Australia shows a disturbing lack of basic understanding of the roles carbon and carbon dioxide play in life processes on planet earth. It also highlights some monumental elementary misapprehensions regarding climate change issues.
A staggering 37% of carbon-based-life-form respondents are keen on reducing carbon in the human body. Perhaps the amputation of an appendage at the end of the leg will be the new way to reduce one’s carbon footprint.
Equally remarkable is the finding that 44% of respondents wish to eliminate carbon and carbon dioxide from food and drink altogether. Nonplussed are the 28% of respondents who don’t think there is any carbon or carbon dioxide in food and drink in the first place.
Another alarming finding is that 47% of respondents think carbon dioxide is a pollutant. Marginally less at 44% give poor old carbon, the sixth element of the periodic table (and my personal favourite, since without it we would not exist), the big thumbs down.
A solid majority of 77% know that carbon dioxide is invisible which is encouraging. Yet, there are still many labouring under the misconception that carbon dioxide is black, grey or white – and in some fanciful imaginings, green, blue, yellow or even purple. Thankfully no polka dots.
In other news the city of Perth will be moving underground as there is heightened fear of Asteroid pollution that will also impact tax rates. Other cities anticipated to follow.
I'm still assuming we have an education system in Australia,
This ignorance is staggering and very alarming. Carbon is one of the basic elements of all organic matter! And yes, I do wonder about the education system when children can leave school without ever having heard of photosynthesis.
Carbon Tax is an absolute joke, morally a do-good 'save the planet' tax that will do little but hurt industry and jobs. The poor will be compensated is also making this an inexcusable Robin Hood Tax.
Whatever one's views on climate change and whether we are causing it, the whole point is that this tax is not going to address any of it. Gillard has never told us how the collection of billions of $$ is suddenly going to morph into a better cleaner environment. She has not presented even the outline of a plan for achieving all these things via the carbon (dioxide) tax.
All we hear are vague promises of "more jobs", "cheaper, renewable energy", "a cleaner environment"........... oh, and the best one - the heart-string tugger..... "a better future for our children". Yes, I want these things too, but HOW is this tax going to produce them? Gillard doesn't know, or she would have told us. I want to see a concrete plan, with real facts, not this load of vague fantasy.
There's no secret about this. They have clearly stated that there will be an increase in the price per tonne every year.when it is introduced at a price, there nothing to stop the government from increasing this tax year after year.
Whatever one's views on climate change and whether we are causing it, the whole point is that this tax is not going to address any of it. Gillard has never told us how the collection of billions of $$ is suddenly going to morph into a better cleaner environment. She has not presented even the outline of a plan for achieving all these things via the carbon (dioxide) tax.
All we hear are vague promises of "more jobs", "cheaper, renewable energy", "a cleaner environment"........... oh, and the best one - the heart-string tugger..... "a better future for our children". Yes, I want these things too, but HOW is this tax going to produce them? Gillard doesn't know, or she would have told us. I want to see a concrete plan, with real facts, not this load of vague fantasy.
Exactly.
this is what the opposition needs to focus on, but they keep getting distracted.
That darn IPCC is such a great fallback for the climate change uneducated. I would LOVE to see some serious debate put forward with some real australian scientists.
But research funding speaks volumes, and on this matter my faith in scientists has seriously diminished over the past decade.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?