Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

Jordan Peterson

Jump to new
My impression:
.fairer audience than what i remember when last giving up with qanda
jp very sensible, .labour lady nearly sensible but no match to jp...the feminists leftists was as bad as expected, our coalition minister not impressive but knew when to stay quiet and the transgender rep very decent, but could be more concise
You could feel the hate of one feminist radical questioner , with very nice answer fromJordan
It was a revelation to realise i live on the same planet that people still having a dream of communism or better radical marxism in 2019.
 
qldfrog said:
My impression:
.fairer audience than what i remember when last giving up with qanda
jp very sensible, .labour lady nearly sensible but no match to jp...the feminists leftists was as bad as expected, our coalition minister not impressive but knew when to stay quiet and the transgender rep very decent, but could be more concise
You could feel the hate of one feminist radical questioner , with very nice answer fromJordan
It was a revelation to realise i live on the same planet that people still having a dream of communism or better radical marxism in 2019.
Click to expand...

The format certainly wasn't good for Peterson as you cannot convey his ideas in just 60 seconds, but he did well. Tony Jones was impartial for a change. The transgender lady was far too verbose, but would have been interesting to hear her in a different environment. The Labor lady was a bit too disingenuous for her own good, dismissing questions regarding conservative opinion being shouted down or prevented by saying that that particular Q&A show proved that was not the case. The Liberal knew when to keep his mouth shut. The Marxist lady .... what can one say.
 
The one minute limit was there to stop Badham dominating the whole show with her outraged verbosity. Thankfully she only got the amount of time she deserved.

Catherine MacGregor was the most intelligent panellist present. Peterson was ok if a bit oversensitive to some questions. If he's going to participate in public discussions he needs to develop a thicker skin and learn how to laugh his critics off.
 
SirRumpole said:
The one minute limit was there to stop Badham dominating the whole show with her outraged verbosity. Thankfully she only got the amount of time she deserved.

Catherine MacGregor was the most intelligent panellist present. Peterson was ok if a bit oversensitive to some questions. If he's going to participate in public discussions he needs to develop a thicker skin and learn how to laugh his critics off.
Click to expand...

Yes, you can only imagine how bad Badhams plays must be; I like MacGregor, read some of her articles on politics where she has made some very good suggestions and predictions, not perfect but the Libs should hire her as an advisor.
 
Last edited:
Watched last night. Jordan was quite respectful, Butler seemed interested in only ridiculing everything he said.

Quota: when Jordan highlighted 99.5% of brickie's Male was interesting.
 
I like this quote from a post on the "Guardian":

As usual Van Badham left them all for dead.
Click to expand...

Also quotes of "JP is an idiot".
Its amusing that certain sections of the left and right find JP so offensive, for advice of what is basically "Deal with your $hit".

I think the real threat is he was winning the hearts and minds war against PC culture.
 
moXJO said:
I like this quote from a post on the "Guardian":



Also quotes of "JP is an idiot".
Its amusing that certain sections of the left and right find JP so offensive, for advice of what is basically "Deal with your $hit".

I think the real threat is he was winning the hearts and minds war against PC culture.
Click to expand...

The most popular argument against Peterson is to try and label him as unintelligent or incoherent, rather than actually addressing the points he is making.
 
I enjoyed it, rare for qanda. The one minute rule was inconsistenly enforced and perhaps 2 minutes might have be slughtly better.

But relatively open dialogues like this are good.... but I thought Milo was a deliberate setup to discredit JP. (which he handled well imo)
 
Junior said:
The most popular argument against Peterson is to try and label him as unintelligent or incoherent, rather than actually addressing the points he is making.
Click to expand...
And its across the board on left sites.
He is instantly labeled as dangerous.
Am I missing something??

Even smh and news.com wrote dismissive articles about him.
Every sjw twitter post takes him out of context, misses the point, or argues some idiotic troll point. His speeches are studiously poured over to find any information that can be dismissed as not factual. Its really friken odd.

And its everywhere he goes. Media seem out to misinterpret what he says.

I'm not a huge fan. But some of his stuff is interesting.
 
And
kahuna1 said:
Jordan and Trump have many things in common.
Both need attention at any cost ....
Click to expand...
They tell unpleasant facts to the brainwashed..
Fake facts: the ones i not want to recognise as they do not fit my ideology.
"1984" will soon be forbidden subversive reading in the west...
 
Peterson is the most featured person on the New Nazi FOX channel. His views, encourage the far right and whilst this numnuts, claims he is middle or somewhere n the middle, the sad reality is that we humans are not that far removed from animals and at times, with little encouragement we revert back to basics.

He has got some idiotic predefined notion of what is going on right now, when white collar crimes in the USA are down 95%, or I should say legal cases under Trump have fallen by 95%.

Head of most agencies now in the USA are ex Lobbyists against the very agency they now head. The NEW USA UN chief ? No qualifications, NONE ... if one doesn't count three husbands .... made Canadian Ambassador and all for her husbands 3 million donation as a coal baron to Trump.

A climate denier, the new UN head ... with NO qualifications now USA representative to the UN. Peterson has not any idea at all about HOW things for the people he now calls the LEFT are. They are asking for basic free medical cover in the USA ,,, shock horror .... Medicare that exists in 65 other nations .... a basic minimum wage ? on and on its goes and for a headline, Plonker PEtrson, Fox calls this cretin and he shows up to promote a right wing view which, he has not any idea about.

How any sane person can say there is more ice ... as I heard this dummy fobbing off the question and the left .... I just ask him to go back into the hole he skulked out of and spend some time, years, on under $10- an hour, without medical care and a medical system that costs 3 times what it does in Canada. He has the humanity of Trump, or lack of it, in large doses. Less I ever see of HIM or FOX news or SKY news, the less sick I will feel.

Peterson doubts the scientific consensus on climate change. [109]


This is just ONE of his KOCH brothers inspired ideas.

Take the time and watch this ...



Jordon or should I call him stupid .... paid for shill ... under that ICE that Trump seems to claim is thicker ... in 2018 a CANADIAN ice breaker in 2018 was able to sail to the NORTH POLE ... at 13 knots ... an impossible thing at any time in the last 60 million years. GOOGLE it ...

But the climate models he is correct, BE skeptical of them .... BECAUSE they are WRONG ... not overstating issues but the very likely UNDERSTATING it ... simple reason being, ARCTIC ice, you just watched ... under it, permafrost ... frozen methane and organic material contains 1.8 trillion tons of CO2 and half of it likely CH4 .... Methane which is 26 times worse than CO2 ... PETERSON is WRONG in his denial and even MORE so as he is right not to believe the climate models. Why ?

Well for political reasons, NO allowance has been made for Arctic ICe melt and the underlying Permafrost. NONE. Its a debate, a depressing one, among experts as to how much is released between 2050 and 2100. I suspect its close to 20%, the other 80% between 2100 and 2150. The worlds experts on this are European and the Oxford and Cambridge ones paint an awful picture on this. Not a thing we can do mind you. NOTHING. Minimum 2100 temp rise, the lowest, is 4 degrees and the biggest is 12 plus.

Jordan knows everything about nothing ....

Oh here is the two favorite climate things that this wanker would never know

First the ICE and Permafrost expert ... Peter the go to guy from Cambridge is no different than the Oxford and 20 other leaders in the filed. ...




Oh and his basis Petersons on virtually every topic ... not just climate change has a stupid if not idiotic view on things, but his climate views are so absurd he actually believes the 10 things covered in this video ... despite scientifically being stupid.



As to his views about economics and even obvious things, he has NO idea. Well he does but it mirrors the far right view on things and thats stuff everyone else. He seems totally oblivious most Americans outside the top 20% see the doctor 20% of what Canadians in the lower 80% do ? No one sure can be that stupid ?

He isn't human is he ? Like Trump, lacks many things that make us humans.

I mention the Arctic Ice for a reason, its the DEAD canary of climate change. Jordan, knowing nothing about the science, is the one in a million who believes they know better, just like TRUMP .
 
Last edited:
56 years of age. Just a Conservative Ida thought. I agree with some of his common sense stuff. An Academic looking to get wealthy? All good experienced Uni Lecturers have that ability to make a Lecture like a performance, you love viewing it.
I'll wait awhile before spending (wasting) my time viewing his vids.
 
Top