- Joined
- 12 April 2007
- Posts
- 999
- Reactions
- 0
Good see some progress being made on this too.ANNOUNCEMENT
9:48 AM Landsat 7 ETM Conceptual Targets at Shay Gap
Good see some progress being made on this too.
Anyone got an overlay where the BHP mines are?
Would nice to see proximity here and the channels...
Not exactly an overlay, but this link takes you to Australia's iron ore mines. Click on the Western Australian Links to mines etc., and this will give you a picture of the mine itself etc., then an overall map of its area by clicking on "maps": http://www.overclockers.com.au/wiki/Google_Maps_Australia_Locations
The DOIR website (doir.wa.gov.au) has google earth overlay files you can download to add in tenements, exploration, mines etc.
It's pretty easy to use, but be aware it uses a *lot* of system resources - with all of them loaded on my home machine with 4 gig ram it runs *very* slowly.
The DOIR website (doir.wa.gov.au) has google earth overlay files you can download to add in tenements, exploration, mines etc.
It's pretty easy to use, but be aware it uses a *lot* of system resources - with all of them loaded on my home machine with 4 gig ram it runs *very* slowly.
Thats the problem I was having! No wonder my old computer would crash every time I tried to import those files!
Just for you YT...But you'll have to wait until later on this evening - works pretty busy at the moment.Hey Doc any chance of getting another cool map (like before) showing JMS's projects realtive to BHP mines?
dj_420. Welcome back! I've missed that icon. I remember it well back in days of old, when JMS was discussed intently back in March/April. Are you back on board? Or have you never left?
I still hold the same packet of shares from March. I'm considering buying more. In fact I'm considering selling part of a certain U producer's shares that I have, in order to free up some cash for more JMS shares. I only wish that I had done that on both fronts 1 week ago.
p.s. YT studies women
As I have already shown JMS could have up to 600Mt's+ of 60%Fe, then again they could have much much less like 50-100Mt's
So keep a sharp look out for results at Brockman
Hi again Young Trader
Re looking at your maths re the above quote. Obviously 600Mt's+ of 60%Fe would be exceptional, and the weakest scenario might be 50-100Mt's. How would each extreme affect the future of JMS's SP? Has JMS already given an estimate? Or is this what you have worked out? In other words would 50-100Mt's still be good? (and improve the SP on it's own), whereas 600Mt's+ be euphoric?
Thanks mate
e Mark
Pretty much mate,
I value JMS at 30c on Mt Mason, Klondyke, and Widgie alone
Mt Mason is only 2Mt's but its DSO ore and could very easily be 5-10x as large, they just need to do more work, as an individual project I would give this a $25m value (inclusive of upside etc) I think this is fair when you consider that IRM trades at a fully dilluted mkt cap of $50m for its speculative exploration grounds near Mt Mason
I would give Klondyke a value of $15m, now I know current JORC is 300k oz's and thus thie represents an EV of $50/oz but you have to remember that the target potential there is multi million ounce's
Widgie gets a speculative value of $5m
Uranium Projects spec value $5m
So Based on these I get
Mt Mason $25m
Klondyke $15m
Widgie $5m
Uranium $5m
So $50m = 30c which is where we are now, this ascribes no value to the other Pilbara Iron Ore projects such as Shay Gap or Brockman
So obviously any discovery at Brockman will add value to where we are IMO
JMS also has 6 million cash in the coffers also YT, just something with the fact that they dont need another cap raising soon.
so followme can steal it and post it as his own at HC
I don't suppose you have the longitude/latitude of them? It'd make my life real easy...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?