IOZ back on a longer term support line and close to the bottom of the channel. People seem to be pretty bearish out there on the overall economy and financial markets. With Jim Chalmers selling armageddon I have a feeling we might be close to a bottom.
that is a diplomatic way of putting it .Governments around the world are doing funny things,
that is a diplomatic way of putting it .
I don't know about a bottom. I'm in two minds here. Maybe we'll see a base in the short term, yes, but looking out a little longer it becomes doubtful.
Governments around the world are doing funny things, I don't think we've seen the end of inflation, and earnings ratios (without being able to quote them) are still at relatively high levels. All reasons why we could see a lower equity markets over the next year or so. A reasonable upcoming earnings season will help, and might reinforce that base we're looking for, for longer term investors anyway.
My systems are still short equity futures, although not convincingly, and equity holdings are now under 40% of that particular account value. If the market rises, fair enough, but I won't be too out of pocket if it goes either way at the moment.
KH
We've got the volatile month of October out of the way, with a reasonably good price increase after that shocking September.
Historically, if we don't look too deeply, November a bit of a placid month, with the long term average price movement somewhere between +0.8% and +2.2%, depending on your look back period.
The details, though, can be a bit concerning. As far as the monthly range goes, November is very similar to other months, with an expected range of about 6 or 7 percent.
The other concerning thing to me is that we still don't have a higher high, so the bouncing off recent lows doesn't look convincing at all, as shown on the attached chart (data from NABTrade, still not updated for October's close).
However, I'm a creature of habit, so I'm sticking with IOZ. The odds are that I'll get a better return from having a few dollars on IOZ than having those same dollars on a nag in tomorrow's Cup.
View attachment 148669
KH
Your chart certainly backs up your argument, but price is on the wrong side of that 200 day moving average as far as I'm concerned.I'm looking at this as a very long term play and buying near the bottom of this chanel seems relatively safe to me, even if the 4 Horsemen arrive. Above $26 support looks good to me. For now. Until those 4 Horsemen I guess.
But banks in Australia are mortgages and so at risk if market crash?Your chart certainly backs up your argument, but price is on the wrong side of that 200 day moving average as far as I'm concerned.
My mind seems to be in a permanent "bearish" mode at the moment. This interest rate thing has been on my mind for a couple of months, and I think we haven't seen half the damage it will do to consumer confidence as yet. As a result, I've steered my portfolio towards those entities which will benefit from this interest rate rise through increased margins, i.e. the major banks.
IOZ is probably a safer bet than banks are on their own, solely because of the diversification obtained by buying this ETF.
KH
(*** sitting on the fence ***)
Of banks in all the world, arguably the Aussie banks are the safest with the government imposed capital controls.But banks in Australia are mortgages and so at risk if market crash?
I mean RE crash
Like STW, A200 and VAS, it's an index fund using float-adjusted market capitalisation. It don't give a damn about a company going broke. WBC blows up (which almost happened) then another company will replace it.
i spent a large part of my early life with various forms of ( non-market ) gambling , and am trying to swap strategies without totally ignoring opportunistic that might ariseYou should change your nick as you are actually have trader mentality if I can call it that.
Index investing in its pure sense takes no account of market dips or other gymnastics. It is intended to continually invest whenever funds are available irrespective of market conditions. The downside of ETFs is they are listed and priced continually during trading hours as a consequence. That in turn panders to the speculative instinct which you have acknowledged in your post.
All this does is to highlight two different investing styles. No one is right, no one is wrong. Its just two different styles of investing.It is intended to continually invest whenever funds are available irrespective of market conditions
This style of investing was largely invented (IMHO) by Jack Bogle and the Vanguard type of investment.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?