This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Internet Filtering: Australia heads further towards totalitarianism

Jump to new
Yep, I heard Ms Wong on radio about this.
Wasn't it just recently that the government was making some complaint about Google invading people's privacy???

I contacted my local Federal member (National) to ask what the Coalition intend doing about the proposed internet filter. I don't suppose I'm too surprised that the reply sits neatly on the fence.

Here it is:

 
With the change of PM, will it simply be a case of Big Brother being side-stepped for Big Sister with regard to this issue?
 
Aussiejeff said:
With the change of PM, will it simply be a case of Big Brother being side-stepped for Big Sister with regard to this issue?
Click to expand...

Nup, Nothing is going to change. What makes you think that our own government is in control?

This internet filtering is global, because the Rothschild family does not like people knowing what is going on.

It sort of bothers them that the internet has all the information that proves that 911 (and many other occult conspiracy s) was an inside job.

You know how they say "God save the Queen", or "God bless America"? Do you know which "God" they are really talking about?

Not many people know. And they like it that way, So the internet is going to be hit hard. That's if they can get away with it.

Find the truth

PS: I do to much research lol
 
electronicmaster said:
Jay Rockefeller: Internet should have never existed
Click to expand...

The interesting point here is that they never advise to fix the real security issue. That security issue is Microsoft products, because only Microsoft products have "any form" of security issue.

Keep in mind that Governments and 85% - 90% of the world user base uses Microsoft. Even if Microsoft Advertises (in every new MS Windows releases) "Windows is more Faster and Secure than ever", you still have the same security BUGS. You also already know the Operating system runs slower because you need to upgrade your hardware.

You are already aware of the Viruses. Funny how 99% of all known Viruses only effect Microsoft Windows. This is because of the Operating System design, not user popularity.

I know this because I have designed my own Computer Operating Systems, and none of them have had a virus attack in the last ten years.

However, if one (a true expert) wants to get into your PC via the Internet? They will, but it is done by hand as they need to route to your PC directly.
No OS no matter what security measures are in place will survive that attack, unless your data is on a CD ROM or DVD ROM. And those medias are not in the PC during the time of attack.
 
Obama Internet kill switch plan approved by US Senate
President could get power to turn off Internet

Here is preview of this storry:-

By Grant Gross
Published: 11:02 GMT, 25 June 10

A US Senate committee has approved a wide-ranging cybersecurity bill that some critics have suggested would give the US president the authority to shut down parts of the Internet during a cyberattack.

Senator Joe Lieberman and other bill sponsors have refuted the charges that the Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act gives the president an Internet "kill switch." Instead, the bill puts limits on the powers the president already has to cause "the closing of any facility or stations for wire communication" in a time of war, as described in the Communications Act of 1934, they said in a breakdown of the bill published on the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee website.

The committee unanimously approved an amended version of the legislation by voice vote Thursday, a committee spokeswoman said. The bill next moves to the Senate floor for a vote, which has not yet been scheduled.
 
I can't see Gillard pushing for anything to extreme.. she seems level headed enough not to get too carried away... at least for the time being. Or at most an Opt-in variant. Or is the GFW off the agenda .. for good?

However if you are concerned that British or US visitors to Australia are unable to watch their favourite shows on the BBC’s iPlayer or the US network’s Hulu service. .. there are some suggestions in the following link!

HOW TO: watch Hulu, BBC iPlayer and more in Australia

or on a more serious note, if you want to be reminded how lucky we are ATM.. with our internet freedom them it's worth visiting

Reporters without Borders

or even download a doc on just how much trouble it is to bypass authoritarian regimes restrictions.

http://en.rsf.org/IMG/pdf/guide_gb_md-2.pdf

Personally, I've never used proxies etc. so I can't comment on their usefulness or recommend any. But the above does make interesting reading.
 
Oh dear, Conroy is back to his old tricks again... if you want to opt-out of the filter then you're obviously a paedophile. As the article says, after 2 years of technical argument as to why censorship will not work all he can come up with is this type of rubbish. Can't think of a time I've ever been more disgusted in the political processes in this country.

Q: What's your personal view of the opt-out and opt-in provisions that could be added to the filter legislation are they a possibility or a good idea or…

Conroy: I'm not into opting into child pr0n.
Click to expand...


http://www.itwire.com/opinion-and-a...-qim-not-into-opting-into-child-pornq?start=1



 

It's the old "Either you are with me or against me" argument. No room for difference of opinion or perspective. The same argument George Bush used to marshall international support for his invasion of Iraq. Of course he is right, right?
 

Yep, what I thought. Nothing has changed. Same government.

I am strongly opposed to child pr0n - it sickens me. But will these creeps will be stopped by internet filtering? I doubt it very much. At best, it might (big might) slow them down temporarily.

IMO, to use child pr0n as their reason for internet filtering could more likely be the excuse to filter any information/news they don't want Oz citizens to see. But then that's probably stating the obvious - lol

 
sails said:
IMO, to use child pr0n as their reason for internet filtering could more likely be the excuse to filter any information/news they don't want Oz citizens to see. But then that's probably stating the obvious - lol

Click to expand...
This was posted a couple of years ago so some may have missed it: https://www.aussiestockforums.com/forums/showthread.php?p=368995&highlight=Hitler#post368995
Mein Kampf; the Ralph Manheim translation published by Houghton-Mifflin, 1943. pg 403.

Perfect explanation IMO.
 
More Orwellian moves:

Source: http://www.smh.com.au/technology/bl...om-in-2010-looks-like-1984/20100618-ykr9.html
 
Thanks for the update Dr Smith.

In response to that I sent this to people on my email list:


Feel free to use any part of this for your own campaign against this increasingly Fascist government.

"Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that you do it." -Mahatma Gandhi.
 
And just for a bit of inspiration from others before us:

 
drsmith said:
Under the radar ?

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/aus...ation-on-the-way/story-e6frgakx-1225889109550

It would be good to see the Coalition's position on this.
Click to expand...
They appear to be sitting on the fence.
See my post above No. 421 quoting response to my question from my local National member.

Given Tony Abbott's ultra conservative views, I wouldn't hold out too much hope of the Coalition not supporting the legislation, unless they simply perceive it as a vote changer in the election. The greens will definitely not support it.
 
"dark" side to be monitored

PM vows to block 'dark side' of net


http://www.theage.com.au/national/pm-vows-to-b-dark-side-of-net-20100707-100og.html

JULIA Gillard says she is aware of public concerns over the mandatory internet filter interfering with ''legitimate use'' but has vowed to push ahead with the controversial proposal.

In her first comments on the filter since assuming the Labor leadership, Ms Gillard told ABC radio in Darwin yesterday that the proposal was an effort to control the ''dark side'' of communications technology.

''Images of child abuse, child pornography - they are not legal in our cinemas,'' the Prime Minister said.

''Why should you be able to see them on the internet? I think that's the kind of moral, ethical question at the heart of this.''

Ms Gillard indicated Communications Minister Stephen Conroy might tweak parts of the proposed filter before it was introduced.

''I understand that there's a set of … technical concerns about internet speed, and also concerns that somehow this accidentally doesn't move into taking away legitimate use of the internet,'' she said.

Vocal filter critic Mark Newton said the comments showed Ms Gillard was not going to use the change of leadership to moderate the party's position on the issue.

What about the thinking side?????

Ban this!!!!

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Australia secretly censors Wikileaks Internet censorship list
Replies
2
Views
5K
doctorj
A
Proposed New Website Blocking Laws
Replies
4
Views
4K
Kimosabi
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...