- Joined
- 6 June 2007
- Posts
- 1,314
- Reactions
- 10
The problem is people.
That's a good motto, IMO.
Democracy - our half-arsed version of it anway - rewards short-termism. Massive expenditure on good public transport pays tremendous dividends... but only after you've been voted out for not spending the same money on stuff people will like straight away.
What are you going to do? Democracy (however half-arsed) is the only system we've ever come up with that stops the powerful openly killing, cooking and eating their enemies. Humans are fundamentally flawed, humans in power especially so, and so we have a political system designed to permit the least possible amount of governing to get done.
We don't trust people in power - rightly so - but that means we can't actually let them do anything.
The only reason we ever got anything done in the past is that political propaganda wasn't quite so well honed, and that left enough room for the occasional dreaming romantic who actually gave a toss about leaving things better than when they got there. Not anymore! Now if someone doesn't spend every ounce of effort and every cent of funding on fire and noise, we tear them apart.
Hope you like the world as it is, 'cause it ain't changing. We're going to entrench the status quo so deep that the status quo will BE the trench.
No seat?I travel most days on the Hurstbridge line and I am yet to get a seat this year. Crazy way of weaning people from using cars.
Great post and i very much agree with you. How do you propose the political system should change so that we do not have the issues you mention above?
the problem is leaders vs politicians. we vote for politicians, not leaders. leaders stand up and tell the people to stfu when they whine, politicians cave in and pander to the slovenly mob. leaders aren't concerned with currying favour, they are concerned with getting the job done, politicians are the exact opposite.
we get the system (and in this case the politicians) we deserve.
The rail system is pretty good in Brisbane as far as I can tell.
My experience is largely no. Just type "London train delays" or "New York train delays" into Google News, you will see what I mean.
I lived in London for two years and was reliant on the Tube. My observations are:
1. it covered an extensive area of greater London and meant you did not need a car;
2. its peak service ran much more frequently than Melbourne's system; and
3. while you had the odd catastrophic day due to signal points freezign over (go figure), on a day-to-day basis it was much more reliable than Melbourne.
Overcrowding, however, was more of a problem on the Tube during peak hour.
Why adapt to mediocrity? Improve the system and be a world leader I say.
Heavens, that sounds like a quite different city from the one I spent a week in about a year ago. Timetables available from several information kiosks, and if that failed always someone who'd happily provide the information, every train and bus we caught was right on time, and pretty clean. Ferries were great.Sydney: Always had some sort of hassle every single time I've used the trains. Trains that leave major city stations ridiculously late, tickets that don't work and leave you effectively locked in the train station (and with nobody around to help). Overcrowding and so on. Toilets are outright disgusting too and no amount of searching around a large city train station lead to me finding anything resembling a timetable - maybe OK for locals, but visitors aren't likely to know when the trains run if there's no timetable!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?