- Joined
- 26 June 2009
- Posts
- 6
- Reactions
- 0
Interesting reply, Calliope.
Reading between the lines (or lack thereof) one must assume that you are or were privy to the dealings between Rio and Chinalco. How else could anyone state categorically, that "We are pretty sure that there was no "bribary" involved?
You might know that there was no "bribary" involved, (if you had personal dealings with Chinalco!)
Miner,
Can you please tell me exactly how the thread title is supposed to read so I can edit it?
At the moment it doesn't seem to make any sense.
i think i'd rather have 11.5 billion than hu and co, poor blokes can't be worth that much in organ value(break up value?).
i appologise in advance.
The person also said if Rudd would have reacted slightly quicker if the Rio Executive was of an English Ancestory than a Chinese ancestory.
Now would be a good time for Rudd to agree to accept the 17 Uighars from Guantanamo that Obama wants us to give asylum to. The Chinese want them sent back to China so they can shoot them.
A gesture like that might give them some respect for the guy, whom they now consider a running dog.
slight extension of what you said to reduce tension here.
What about Rudd takes Mr Hu in exchange of 27-year-old Australian beauty therapist Schapelle Corby who is in Indonesian Jail ? She will entertain them nicely in China and could enhance business for Rio too.
Then Rudd brings back Mr Hu to Australia. Big political gain.
To compensate Indonesian loss he could then offer Mr Turnbull in exchange who is destined to be a better joker than any one so far Australia seen and making spinster lawyer Ms Julie Bishop to glory the opposition leader's chair.
I do not think the above action will be more complex than calling on the acting Chinese Ambassador (not even the full timer one) in Australia repeatedly with no bite but light barking ?
Geez ... that's out of character, a complete 180 degree turn considering what you said earlier
Rudd and Smith have finally had some backbone inserted into their cavities and are speaking to the Chinese about Steven Hu.
http://www.smh.com.au/national/pm-raises-rio-case-with-beijing-20090714-dk56.html
Are holy now politicians parliament in?
Geez ... that's out of character, a complete 180 degree turn considering what you said earlier:
Hi Shag
NO doubt you could be very astute as a trader but your comments on Mr Hu adn reference to organ value appeared to be words chosen very poorly and more sounding like your nick name.
No apology for my comment however and I am not of the same origin of Mr Hu. If you really consider when your comments are read by any member of Mr Hu's family or Chinese Australian fraternity. how they feel about it.
Thanks for understanding
Now ... you're just as bad as Shag aren't you?
Considering your grammar is off I have a hunch that you are of the same origin as our man Hu.
Thanks Calliope to rise with the occasion for national interestI disagree. Miner has exhibited a good example of lateral thinking. He has also summed up our leaders exactly with no bite but light barking.
Here is a bit of Chinese logic, the way to save money on piling's and as they are underground no one will know.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?