Re: FWL - Ferrowest Limited
Originally Posted by danewbee
25.3% Fe grade? Even considered as poor grade in China. By Australian standard, it is waste, not ore. Try to upgrade it into 65%, you need at least 3t of ore to get 1t of sellable products. The mining and processing cost will be huge.
As you stated above you need to move “3t of ore to get 1t of sellable products” , shipping that would incur a high cost that clearly the company has taken into account hence the merchant pig iron.
This is stated in their announcement “
The ITmk3 ® technology produces merchant pig iron (“MPI”) in the form of 96%Fe iron nuggets that are very easy to handle, store and transport. It is also a premium product for end users (primarily electric arc furnace steel makers) due to its very low contaminant levels and high storage density. “
http://www.ferrowest.com.au/Announcements/2007/ASX Announcement ITmk3 Developments 20June07.pdf
Also point taken, but they have four backup technologies after ITmk3, so they aren’t playing around, shows good management.
Originally Posted by danewbee
“The management need to prove the capability to handle both mining business and pig iron making business”
hope that helps with your questions since you obviously don’t read the announcements.
You are the only one that following the rules, no personal attack, no name calling although I pay no attention to this kind of noise.
YOu might consider this:
Situation A: Grade 1% with 50 times as much resources
Situation B: Grade 50%
According to your study, the capex per tonnne would be the same.
How about Opex?
It is very clear, FWL will not make good money being an iron ore producer for the reason of low grade ore, which need spending more money to process to higher grade for sell, or iron and steel making.
In stead, the company comes up with an idea of pig iron plant to justify the business case. It could be very successful, and could be a totally failure.
It will be fine if you understand the risk, It is not a blue sky. The management need to prove the capability to handle both mining business and pig iron making business. Otherwise, just remember, there are handreds of pig iron plants in China, Korea, and Japan, if not thousands. What is your advantage over them? And who want more pollution near their backyard?
This is why most iron ore companies, like BHP, RIO, FMG, MGX send most of their ore to China, Korea, and Japan, not to build more plants on Australian soil.
Good luck with FWL holding. I promise this is my last post if there is no more name calling.
Originally Posted by danewbee
25.3% Fe grade? Even considered as poor grade in China. By Australian standard, it is waste, not ore. Try to upgrade it into 65%, you need at least 3t of ore to get 1t of sellable products. The mining and processing cost will be huge.
As you stated above you need to move “3t of ore to get 1t of sellable products” , shipping that would incur a high cost that clearly the company has taken into account hence the merchant pig iron.
This is stated in their announcement “
The ITmk3 ® technology produces merchant pig iron (“MPI”) in the form of 96%Fe iron nuggets that are very easy to handle, store and transport. It is also a premium product for end users (primarily electric arc furnace steel makers) due to its very low contaminant levels and high storage density. “
http://www.ferrowest.com.au/Announcements/2007/ASX Announcement ITmk3 Developments 20June07.pdf
Also point taken, but they have four backup technologies after ITmk3, so they aren’t playing around, shows good management.
Originally Posted by danewbee
“The management need to prove the capability to handle both mining business and pig iron making business”
hope that helps with your questions since you obviously don’t read the announcements.