prawn_86
Mod: Call me Dendrobranchiata
- Joined
- 23 May 2007
- Posts
- 6,637
- Reactions
- 7
But I am thinking...if I do manage to accumulate a sufficient deposit, I'd be effectively selling my income-generating assets to buy an asset that doesn't generate my income, and then I'd have to spend the next 30 years paying it off.
Not without the security of tenure they have in Europe you don't.
By the way, it's a bit of a stretch to categorize property as a depreciating asset. In fact only the improvements depreciate, the land itself is a potentially appreciating asset.
A mate of mine has been buying property since the 70's
You don't need any security of tenure; it's just irrelevant. Worst comes to worst, they can't kick you out by law if you have nowhere else to go anyway.
As for depreciating assets, historically that is the case. It obviously is not the case in a big bubble boom - but we are past that, and such it is not worth talking about appreciating land prices anymore.
That is just plain incorrect. Sorry, you have no idea what you're talking about.
I have some sympathy with that point of view, but there is just as much probability that currencies will continue to be undermined, resulting in higher inflation. You don't need a 'boom' for property values to appreciate.
Actually it is plain correct. Buy a unit in a bogan suburb, rent it out to a bogan family, and try and ask them to leave - see what happens.
I don't know whether you imagine the police will break in, arrest them and throw their crap out - but the reality will not match.
Although this is NSW I am talking about here, I am unsure if other states will be the same.
I have some sympathy with that point of view, but there is just as much probability that currencies will continue to be undermined, resulting in higher inflation.
I’m assuming if you don’t own your home you are renting at present ?, surely you need to add that into the equation ?, yes you will have sold your income producing assets but if you are going to live in the property you are not paying rent.......
I haven't read all the posts in this thread. I've dipped in a couple of times. If your aim is to have a deposit for a house in a two to three year time frame then I'd be looking to keep most of your savings in pursuit of that objective in cash (say a uBank account) and take a chance at risking only a small portion on the stock market. If you are an active trader already and your market time frame is a matter of hours or days or a few weeks well you might want to deploy more of your savings into trading. If you are not a trader then two to three years is a short time frame on the market. You run the risk of seeing your capital fall in value over that period and you have to decide is it worth the risk of losing say 20% of your capital over that period and what would that do to the aim of saving for a house deposit.
Be an Average Joe and buy Telstra shares and you will be sitting pretty.
More people have made more money servicing the mining industry than the miners themselves - FOREVER! It goes back to the gold rush days, and continues today.Everyone tries to get onto operating mines driving trucks and stuff. But as you see some very good money in the construction side of things.
Rent will increase gradually with inflation and this process is endless.Agree Julia.
Great posts here
I really dont understand the concept of people that rent, at least paying a mortgage there is an end.
I have had this conversation with a few people through the years, and it just baffles me, so I say, each to their own.
And there's the other huge downside of renting. You live on the landlord's terms, something I quite often hear mentioned in various contexts by friends who rent.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?