This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

House prices to stagnate for 'years'

Status
Not open for further replies.
wayneL said:
I have involved myself in endeavours which are recession proof/resistant (particularly my new position).

care to elaborate on that a little for us noobs?

gold? silver? soft commodities?
 
kransky said:
care to elaborate on that a little for us noobs?

gold? silver? soft commodities?

Trading wise, it's up to my own performance rather than the economy, so yes any or all of the above... options... whatever I think I can lift a few bucks from. A bear market won't make much difference.

What I was referring to was that I have taken a position in a company that aquires and manages assets for itself (through connections and luck more than ability I assure you ) The nature of the assets makes the business and therefore my income fairly recession proof.

I'll be working for a living for the first time in six years (apart from a brief stint a couple of years ago)
 
Check out this blog post... straight from the elephants' mouth:

 
Once the stock market boom is over the day will come again for property. It's good for Australia to have this commodity based boom and bad news for property prices. No point investing in a going nowhere property, when you THINK you can make a huge bundle in the stock market.
 
In one paragraph you are living with hill billies and in the next you speak of crime ridden/drug dealing areas. You have it wrong! It is not the hill billies out there who are pushing drugs. And a boring life? Get real.
A hill billie and pround of it.
trueblue
 
I read an article in yesterdays Melbourne paper, you now need an income of 110k pa to service the average house price/mortgage in Melbourne, ten years ago it was 43k.


The average young person has got buckleys chance.
 
hello,

a few weeks have passed,

prices solid as, you missed out waitng for the crash again on real estate

demand still strong, people got to live somewhere

get in as early as you can

thankyou

robots
 
robots said:
hello,

a few weeks have passed,

prices solid as, you missed out waitng for the crash again on real estate

demand still strong, people got to live somewhere

get in as early as you can

thankyou

robots
Oh please!

What's this, a property ramp? Cycles take time. Settle down and watch it play out. The fun is only just beginning.
 
hello,

where's the fun beginning?

nowhere

buy quality,

thankyou

robots
 
numbercruncher said:
I read an article in yesterdays Melbourne paper, you now need an income of 110k pa to service the average house price/mortgage in Melbourne, ten years ago it was 43k.


The average young person has got buckleys chance.

Yep that would be true and Adelaide is not too far behind that with an average house in an average suburb now needeing 81k.

Scenario: Mum and Dad now working about 50 hours a week and under severe morgagte stress, kids never see parents, kids eating microwave dinners in front of the telly, family structure breaking down etc etc ya get the picture.

All this cause some F-ck stick owns 98 homes, and now 97 familes have to endure higher prices.

Remember that almost all monies borrowed over the last 7 years from banks/finance companies has done very little about building new homes for those 97 families its just jacked up the prices of existing homes.
 
Stop_the_clock said:
All this cause some F-ck stick owns 98 homes, and now 97 familes have to endure higher prices.

Those stories should inspire you, not make you bitter.
I reckon that F--ck stick probably wasnt born rich and theres every chance he was once the struggler you now came to be.

He didnt become a champion from crying about it.
 
Jim Rogers has his say:


http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idU...mp;pageNumber=1

Top investor sees U.S. property crash
Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:59PM EDT

By Elif Kaban

MOSCOW (Reuters) - Commodities investment guru Jim Rogers stepped into the U.S. subprime fray on Wednesday, predicting a real estate crash that would trigger defaults and spread contagion to emerging markets.

"You can't believe how bad it's going to get before it gets any better," the prominent U.S. fund manager told Reuters by telephone from New York.

"It's going to be a disaster for many people who don't have a clue about what happens when a real estate bubble pops.

"It is going to be a huge mess," said Rogers, who has put his $15 million belle epoque mansion on Manhattan's Upper West Side on the market and is planning to move to Asia.

Worries about losses in the U.S. mortgage market have sent stock prices falling in Asia and Europe, with shares in financial services companies falling the most.

Some investors fear the problems of lenders who make subprime loans to people with weak credit histories are spreading to mainstream financial firms and will worsen the U.S. housing slowdown.

"Real estate prices will go down 40-50 percent in bubble areas. There will be massive defaults. This time it'll be worse because we haven't had this kind of speculative buying in U.S. history," Rogers said.

"When markets turn from bubble to reality, a lot of people get burned."

The fund manager, who co-founded the Quantum Fund with billionaire investor George Soros in the 1970s and has focused on commodities since 1998, said the crisis would spread to emerging markets which he said now faced a prolonged bear run.

"When you have a financial crisis, it reverberates in other financial markets, especially in those with speculative excess," he said.

"Right now, there is huge speculative excess in emerging markets around the world. There will be a lot of money coming out of emerging markets.

"I've sold out of emerging markets except for China," said Rogers, long a prominent China bull.

Even in China, the world's fastest expanding economy, Rogers said stocks were overvalued and could go down 30-40 percent.

But he added: "China is one of the few countries in the world where I'm willing to sit out a 30-40 percent decline."

The last stock market bubble to burst was the dot-com craze which sparked a crash from March 2000 to October 2002.

When the last bubble burst in Japan, said Rogers, stock prices went down 85 percent despite the country's high savings rate and huge balance of payment surplus.

"This is the end of the liquidity party," said Rogers. "Some emerging markets will go down 80 percent, some will go down 50 percent. Some will most probably collapse."
 
As an aside, I don't understand all the animosity towards landlords with a few houses. I might question the wisdom of some more recent investments, but that is a risk they take, fully cognizant of the downside (we hope).

Without LLs there would be no houses to rent, or utter rubbish supplied by government.

I'm living in a comfortable house in a nice area rented from a private LL, because a) I don't want to buy at current valuations b) We knew we would be moving around a bit.

I'm appreciative of the LL and he's appreciative that I supply him money and look after the house like my own. As long as everyone fulfills their side of the contract it works great.

As I've got a foot in each camp I understand each side. So let's not down LL's on some extremely ideological and poorly thought out premise, our society needs them.

I would just like to see more understanding and respect from each side and less outright greed. (It is greed that creates poor LLs and poor tenants)

It is not investors "fault" that prices have run up to unjustifiable extremes, it is more to do with inflationary oversupply of fiat money and loose credit. This will change as these factors roll back in the future.

Young people need just wait for the right time

Cheers
 
hello,

young people need to stop spending their money not wait for RE crash

if more people saved money things would be a lot easier for them, but no, they want to give it to companies

you could get 100 fund managers, economists, yourself and not one of you can predict the future

the fact is quality blue chip RE has not been stagnate and infact has increased

isn't there that saying "time in the market not timing the market", bet there's plenty of happy shareholders who bought pre 2000

thankyou

robots
 
robots said:
hello,

where's the fun beginning?

nowhere

buy quality,

thankyou

robots
Nowhere? Ever heard of Sydney where prices are down 13% in nominal terms and far more in real terms?

Or for that matter Hobart where, by doing literally nothing, I've watched a small weatherboard house turn into a bigger brick one and get cheaper in the processs. All while my money earned actual profits in stocks and bank accounts with no rates or insurance required.
 

Robots,

1/ credit is still unbelievably, irresponsibly loose

2/ when credit tightens, as is inevitable (it is starting) RE will start to correct seriously

3/ "time in the market not timing the market" is true for the Loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong term and ignores a whole bunch of other pertinent factors. The real question is, "how long have you got?". Purchasers of any sort of asset immediatly prior to Oct 1929 would be quids in now, but it took decades for their asset prices to just recover. Timing is not a reality for most people, but only buying at value is.

4/ bet there's plenty of happy shareholders who bought pre 2000 Of course there is because that is when there was good value in the market. But now we have the equivalent of NAB (a blue chip) at a P/E of 40 i.e. very poor value. Elementary stuff.

5/ you could get 100 fund managers, economists, yourself and not one of you can predict the future Neither then, can you. Which makes your assertions that RE will never go down and to buy now, utterly ludicrous... in fact highly irresponsible. You cannot know that.

6/ Blue chip RE is AT PRESENT under extreme price pressure in both USA and Ireland...

7/ Are you a RE agent?
 
hello,

I dont know what credit has to do with young people, why do they need credit? they do not save.

no I am not an RE agent

if your buying your own home get in as early as possible, within 10-15km of capital city, prices are strong as, or other popular area

buts things havent been stagnate have they, or crashed, or corrected,

I havent made any predictions, I have constantly said get in now as things are solid as, and they are

the longer you wait the harder it will be

thankyou

robots
 
robots said:
hello,

I dont know what credit has to do with young people, why do they need credit?
Uuuuuuuuuuuuummmmmmmmmmmm...... To get a mortgage? lol

Jim Rodgers said:
"This is the end of the liquidity party," said Rogers. "Some emerging markets will go down 80 percent, some will go down 50 percent. Some will most probably collapse."
You think this won't affect us in Oz. It will. Credit will be MUCH tighter...

....no sub-prime/"creative finance", no 100/120% loans, no ludicrous income/loan multiples, no MEW.

It will be back to 80% minimum LVR and 3 times earnings... and incredibly difficult to get.

The party is over, time to pay the tab
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...