- Joined
- 25 February 2007
- Posts
- 838
- Reactions
- 1
Record Debt Levels + Negative Savings Rates = All Hell Breaking Out, the only question is when...
Interesting read, but imho it makes a better case for land prices going up faster than ever than for governments to ease restrictions. Land use restrictions are increasing, and will continue to increase (a) as environmental concerns mount, and (b) as food production gets more important.
The outcome will be more people crammed into less space, making land and house prices less affordable than ever.
The figures show that Gen-Y simply arnt buying, thats when Pyramid schemes come undone, when they dont get new entrants.
Gen y simply arnt interested in debt slavery home ownership, they are the gimme now generation, Ipods, foreign holidays, rock concerts, generally having a ball and adding to Inflation
Gen x seem to be the ones obsessed by home ownership, they are something like 20pc of the population and 50pc of the debt
And yet you seem to ignore that this is not the case in at least some countries comparable to Australia (Canada & parts of USA in particular) or even in some high population density countries like Germany (where prices have been flat or falling for decades) or Japan..
Anyone involved in overseas markets such as the US or UK must be experiencing deja vu reading these threads. I'm most familiar with the UK market as I had a bit of a flutter here a few years ago.
The very same arguments that the bulls are using on this thread, was being used by the bulls here... exactly the same. i.e. immigration, supply and demand, strong economy, this market is different yada yada yada.
Yet the RE market here has turn to **** in the last six months. It's happening folks, it's beginning to crash... and quickly. Whether that continues and we see rather large reductions in prices, we'll just have to wait and see; but these cycle tend to be played out over a period of years rather than months.
Distress sales are everywhere and "buy at 20% below market and rent back to owner" companies are busy as anything. (These figures are not reflected in most indicies, or in the mortgagee sales number). Realistic vendors are flogging there houses at 2005 values while everything else is sticking.
I Cheltenham where I live, the amount of "won't sell, so I'll rent it out" rental stock is amazing and rents are dropping as there is competition for tenants.
I've just signed on to a new build (six months old) property that represents 2.9% yield and at a 15% discount to what the first tenant paid. LOL
Now remind me why Australia is so different? It's just a matter of time and global economic tipping points. Already stuff is happening behind the scenes in Oz financial markets.
The prudent will come out fine in the end, but prices are set at the margins and the margin is veeeery stretched... everywhere.
Now, I'm sick of this discussion because we are going around in circles and repeating ourselves. I'm off to lech at some hot Polish ladies before they all go home to Poland.
Now remind me why Australia is so different? It's just a matter of time and global economic tipping points. Already stuff is happening behind the scenes in Oz financial markets.
We are better educated, more mobile (vertically and internationally), and are earning much more at a younger age than previous generations. The next 20 years will be a buffet of opportunity for us as the boomers retire and sell up all the assets that they have acquired in lieu of a lifestyle. You certainly don't need to feel sorry for this inner city renter.
Perhaps my experience is not generalisable, but in my social circles the only people who seem to be worried that my generation aren't buying houses is the generation who wants to sell them to us.
Hang on a minute! That's my argument! WTF?No doubt this year will be the worst in some peoples lives then,.... other more advanced investors will probally say it was the best time of there investing life.
it's all a cycle wayne,.... downturns come and go,... you just have to have your business setup so it doesn't wipe you out,.... and think of stratergies that you will still beable to keep working at throught the down turn.
I'm glad you look abroad Tom and try to find some answers or get some perspective. But I think it's important to understand why a situation is the way it is. If we want to throw in comparisons why can't we also cite examples such as South Africa or Ireland. Why is RSA an interesting case? Well, it's prime borrowing rate is 14.5%, and it's economy continues to grow. How can that be?
Might pay to check again. I've heard some stories of dodgy lending there too. hard to get the real picture though.Last time I checked, sub-prime and credit-crunch was not a Chinese agenda.
Oh they're sharper than that! They kick the local chavette's backside in the jobs stakes. My personal banker at HSBC is a very pretty Polish lady. Fortunately she is engaged (or unfortunately as the case may be ) to a Pom so will be staying on.I'm sorry to hear that the pretty Polish cleaning ladies might be heading home. DIY could mean something different in the coming years.
ASX.G
Piece of useless information for ya'll , in 1989 in the 25-29 age group 45pc of ppl had children, in 2004 that had dropped to 29pc - I wonder how much can be directly attributed to affordability and how much to lifestyle ?
1 November, 2007: Generation Y's preference for the inner city rental life over mortgages and McMansions isn't a sign of immaturity or snobbery, writes Scott Hickie. Rather, it shows their knack for sophisticated microeconomic modelling
Economically speaking, the boomer seachange is ironic because their financial profile opens up a wider spectrum of choices in the property market, yet they select areas that won't have the infrastructure demanded by well-heeled retirees, until they have more than one foot in the grave.
Yet it is Gen X real estate economics that really crumbles into a flickering wasteland of empty home ownership dreams, when compared to the advanced calculus deployed by Gen Y. Sailing beyond the idealism of their 20s into the distorting social pressures of haphazard mortgage chasing, Gen X economics reverberate the simplistic notion that financial sacrifices made in obtaining a mortgage are a guaranteed future windfall. It's elementary classical economics where lost cultural development, martial disintegration and psychological mortgage belt stress are costs neither internalised into accounting ledgers nor ascribed adequate value.
They are undeterred by sub-prime trying to tear the US economy a new orifice, or by the hordes of mortgage-stressed families evicted by predatory backyard financiers hiding behind solicitor lenders across Sydney's western suburbs. For Gen X it is full steam ahead in claiming their rightful access to the Australian home ownership dream, regardless of their capacity to service exorbitant and grossly inflated interest repayments.
Gen X real estate economics resembles that of a drug runner trying to make the transition to drug dealer. The mentality pervading Gen X economic modelling is essentially: 'I don't give a **** where, when, how or why, just deal me into the game.' Home ownership becomes the magical panacea to financial security and the road to becoming Mr BIG.
I'm glad you look abroad Tom and try to find some answers or get some perspective. But I think it's important to understand why a situation is the way it is. If we want to throw in comparisons why can't we also cite examples such as South Africa or Ireland. Why is RSA an interesting case? Well, it's prime borrowing rate is 14.5%, and it's economy continues to grow. How can that be?
Or what about Ireland? From a practically bankrupt country back in the 80s, to some 25 years later where they're the second richest country in Europe, per capita, behind little Luxembourg.
How is this so? Furthermore, what does this look like? Well, from what I understand (having some great Irish friends myself) it means that if you want to find a rental you get up at the crack of dawn every Saturday and fight your way to open houses and fill in applications hand over fist. It also means that the landlord of the place you are renting is raising rents as fast as your own salary and house prices are increasing so you continue to struggle to get the deposit needed to break free. Things can get much worse and stay bad if the conditions for their perpetuation remain.
I'd be more interested in lengthy discussion if it included answers to some of these questions, because I think it's just as relevant as it is to identify why Germany is a bad example.
I have an idea, lets give Western Aust and parts of SA and NT to an empirical communist state for a few decade and lets see what kind of shape it's in when we get it back. Then we try growing our combined economies from there, whadda ya say?
And Japan. I think Japan is one of the most unique countries on earth and has suffered a unique fate for many decades now. Use it as a reference point at your own peril, IMO.
Its all cyclic, not straight up as some head strong housing gurus suggest!
Please "robots" stop ramping this over-heated housing market
In 1996 we had high interest rates and by 1999/2000 the bottom of the housing market was hit.
In 2008 we have high interest rates and by 2011/2012, the bottom of the housing market will be hit.
Get my drift....house prices are heading down
Its all cyclic, not straight up as some head strong housing gurus suggest!
Please "robots" stop ramping this over-heated housing market
In 1996 we had high interest rates and by 1999/2000 the bottom of the housing market was hit.
In 2008 we have high interest rates and by 2011/2012, the bottom of the housing market will be hit.
Get my drift....house prices are heading down
Its all cyclic, not straight up as some head strong housing gurus suggest!
Please "robots" stop ramping this over-heated housing market
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.