HUNDREDS of people could lose their deposits and their new homes after administrators were appointed yesterday to Beechwood Homes, NSW's largest home builder.
Just another day in the RE correction ?, Largest home builder in NSW gos bust, housing shortage ? .......
http://www.news.com.au/business/story/0,23636,23696445-462,00.html
professor_frink; said:When Henley pulled out of NSW a few years back, the impact was fairly minimal, people that were buying homes just went and bought them from another builder, there wasn't exactly a shortage of companies building that type of home. There's still heaps of them around.
Forgive my ignorance but did Henley go bust?
hello,
thanks swannie, keep that immigration going will be fantastic
going to go down to salvo's tomorrow pick up some bunk beds for my rooms, i reckon i could get 4 in each room, $800/wk sensational
thankyou
robots
professor_frink; said:No. They are still going in Victoria and Sth Oz(I think). Though they disappeared from NSW pretty well overnight and were one of the biggest in the state at the time. Apart from some slight disruptions to the various companies that were supplying them with materials, business went on as per usual. These kinds of companies are a dime a dozen, if they don't control the land content of entire suburbs on their own, then there will be plenty of others that can step in and take over
Forgive me, but pulling out of a market, and the biggest builder in NSW going bust is two very different scenarios ??? Hundreds of people potentially getting stuffed on their deposits - I'm sure the press will make hay.
Gives the confidence a tad of a knock - somewhat?
Salvos ?
Is your Job under threat in the Building game Robi ? I heard its getting cut throat ....
awesome stuff
was thinking last night about mr keen and his television appearance the other week, openly admitting to having a huge mortgage yet so "keen" to comment on debtwatch
thankyou
robots
That's such a typical response from a skeptic. An analyst is making a claim on certain things with complete facts and evidences. However, instead of analysing the claims in a serious way, the skeptic attempts to dismiss / debunk them by critising the analyst him/herself. It is by the far the most common and easiest way to "arrogantly" ignore a fact.
This entire thread is making history, and thanks to you Robi. I'm sure even the most "bullish" RE players will try to stay away from you from making a bad name even for themselves.
If you don't agree with Mr Keen, why don't you provide some evidences to support your claims?
hello,
thanks temjim good comments,
actually the rba has continually stated that household debt is well under control.
thankyou
robots
Mr Stevens also said house prices in Australia were very high relative to household income.
"Housing prices are very, very high relative to income," he said.
One consequence of these changes is that the overall riskiness of the mortgage portfolios of financial institutions is likely to have increased. Residential property prices are high relative to historical benchmarks, household debt levels are much higher relative to income than they have been in the past, borrowing by investors has grown rapidly, competition for loan origination has been very strong, and some borrowers who previously would not have been able to obtain mortgages can now do so. These developments raise the possibility that future default rates may not be as benign as those in the past
Are you ever going to back statements like that up with Quotes from the RBA ? Because it seems you just make them up, its ok to make things up but not to claim another body said it ...
http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,23483106-953,00.html
hello,
i note you say they "also" said...
people can always get a second job or a higher paying job if affordabilty is an issue or they can rent, no big deal really
thankyou
robots
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.