- Joined
- 3 January 2007
- Posts
- 940
- Reactions
- 2
Hi - yea I saw that chart. To be honest, something looks not quite right about that to me, and I'd like to dig deeper. I don't see how real house prices have on average nearly tripled since 1985? Since that time the actual prices have gone up by about 4-5x, but there has been a LOT of inflation, and real wages growth since that time as well? For example, my parents sold a house (Sydney suburbs) in 1985 for $110k - that same house today would cost around $550k - that's ~7% compound price growth over 23 years - inflation alone over that time would have been roughly 4-5% pa, so I just can't see where a 2.5+ times real price growth (as shown in that chart) comes from???
Maybe the problem is that ultimately you have to factor real wages and disposable income plus general average wealth to guage where "fair value" for house prices *should* be? I mean our living standards, both purely financially and in terms of quality of housing (size, amenities) etc have all increased dramatically since 1890 haven't they? But using the example of my parents house above, I think there is something fishy with that chart anyway....
Cheers,
Beej
If you wish to dig deeper, take a read at Nigel Stapledon's PDH thesis, titled "Long term housing prices in Australia and some economic perspectives". It does get fairly technical though. It should give you a better explanation on how he comes with the data.
http://www.library.unsw.edu.au/~thesis/adt-NUN/public/adt-NUN20071210.120652/index.html
Some additional charts with explanations from Steve Keen.
http://www.debtdeflation.com/blogs/2008/06/30/debtwatch-no-24-july-2008/
Remember though, you can't just use your parents' house as a basis for the entire property market.
Another statistic you can use is the average mortgage repayment to average income ratio. It's fairly known and highly promoted by the media. It's a fact that this ratio has increased by a fair amount over the last several years.