- Joined
- 13 April 2007
- Posts
- 801
- Reactions
- 0
Sorry Helixers, can't help myself.
After CUL's Friday run I'm inspired (and who cares about width in announcing results anyway
Still breaching YT copyright but updated-
RHI
40 Million shares @ $3.20 = 128 mil MC
20% of 135MT @ 58.5% Fe = 15.79MT of Fe
EV = $8.11 Fe/T
CUL
475 M shares @ 14.0c = 66.5 mil MC
30% of 68MT @ 56% Fe = 11.4 MT of Fe
EV = $5.83 Fe/T *
Now if we only look @ HLX's 'Kumina Creek' target and the conservatively stated >100 MT @ between 57% and 60% Fe.
HLX
128 M shares (fully diluted including new options) @ 34.5c = 44.1 mil MC
30% of 100MT @ 57% Fe = 17.1 MT of Fe
EV = $2.58 Fe/T
Again if we use CUL’s EV value we are looking @ 99.70c per HLX share.
Now wondering why our friends @ RHI and AQA are buying heaps of HLX shares and why AQA have put back the PFS again and HLX’s JORC to after Xmas??????????????????
If we look a bit closer at HLX’s figure regarding 'Kumina Creek'
(2700 x 900 x >30m @ 57-60%) and reduce the 30m by 30% to 20m to remain conservative and also use the low end 57% Fe value.
We get 48,600,000 tonnes and multiplying by an SG of 3.0 (for CID) we arrive at 145,800,000 tonnes of Fe.
30% to HLX @ 57% Fe = 24,931,800, tonnes
Multiplied by an EV of $5.83 = $1.45 per HLX share
Now considering the amount of drilling that may be completed on the large Bonham ‘Marra Mamba’ target and/or ‘Robe’ areas by the time the JORC is due who knows what we may be looking at?
Where are those gold results from Glenburgh anyway
Hope the calc's are right (have double checked) but very weary.
Night all
Jtb...I know little of RHI, but have to say that you are grossly underestimating what CUL have.
On friday CUL announced an extension of the the northern section of Catho Well. The north west section which has yet to be drilled extends at least 4x further than the north section. Then Cul has a further 3 tenements in the same Brockman formatiion.
After all of this there are the other JVs which CUL has
What I am basically getting at is that making your comparison leaves out many many details. I'm not saying one is worth more than the other, just saying well diverisifed compaines such as CUL with interests in Nickel, Iron, IOCG and Gold need to be valued on more than just one tenement in one commodity.