- Joined
- 21 June 2009
- Posts
- 5,880
- Reactions
- 14
Yes I am surprised it was only 60%. I have never met anybody who doesn't want health reform. It was however the wrong question.
If the question had been,
Would you trust this government to implement a cost efficient health reform plan?
Rudd would have got whacked.
Just received this email.
Subject: Kevin Rudd's Health Plan
As a rule, I don't pass along these "add your name" lists that appear in emails, BUT this one is important.
It has been circulating for months and has been sent to over 20 million people.
We don't want to lose any names on the list so just hit forward and send it on.
Please keep it going!
To show your support for Kevin Rudd's health care reform, please go to the end of the list and add your name.
1. Wayne Swan.
2.
In an attempt to ease tensions, NSW will be handed the lion's share of an unprecedented national funding package, worth an extra $15.6 billion, under which the Commonwealth will lock in cast-iron health funding increases of 8.3 per cent a year.
Victoria, where political resistance is strongest to the reforms, is to be offered an extra $3.8 billion, Queensland an extra $3.4 billion and South Australia $1.1 billion. The remaining billions are to be shared out between the ACT, Western Australia, Tasmania and the Northern Territories.
One can't help feeling suspicious that our Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has a hidden agenda for wanting to push his undetailed health reform before the release of the Henry tax reveiw and the budget.
We may well be in for some surprises leading up to the election.
I can hardly wait for the first patient to wake up with a pair of scissors still left inside them after an operation. I wonder if there is enough monies left in the grab bag to payout the malpractice suit? Rudd offers another 15 billion to sweeten the deal to get the Premiers to sign on the dotted line. Where is the money coming from again? Anyone seen any forecasts or details as to how the GST is funding this parallel commonwealth bureaucracy gone mad? How is is it decided that the GST funds are split up? Let's say that WA contributes a majority of GST revenue due to mining etc but has the least amount of population. Does this mean this state is worse off or better off under Herr Rudds health plan? Is there a surplus of GST revenue and if so where does it go? STILL NO DETAILS other than 30% of GST taken away from state control and allegedly being placed back into health ??
"As Prime Minister, I was elected with a mandate to deliver better health and hospital services for all Australians," Chairman Rudd thundered. OOoooooer ... sounds like the Supreme Leader has spoken.
One can't help feeling suspicious that our Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has a hidden agenda for wanting to push his undetailed health reform before the release of the Henry tax reveiw and the budget.
We may well be in for some surprises leading up to the election.
If the Premiers sign up to Rudd's Plan before they know the content of the Henry Review, they're even greater fools than they've so far demonstrated.
Talk about half-cocked Rabble-Rousers!
Don't even know the basics that are enshrined in the system.
Talk about gullible fools.
Whatever happened to health system reform? They are certainly not discussing it in Canberra. It is on the back burner.
As with all COAG meetings it has descended into a bun fight over money. Like vultures they are fighting over their share of the taxpayers' carcase.
Brumby says they can't discuss reform until until they sort the money out
The aged, the infirm and the mentally ill should be very worried.
Every time Rudd opens his mouth to put another "sweetener" on the table, Swan has to rule a line under his Budget proposals and start again. The allocation for Rudd's bribes is reaching massive proportions.
Why so?
Seems I struck a nerve
So I take it none of you have read the policy just the media headlines!
Because health system reform seems to have disappeared from the agenda.
Yes they are. Have a bit of a read. http://www.coag.gov.au/intergov_agreements/federal_financial_relations/index.cfm
Well you may be right there. It seems a couple of states are now complicating things and want to change at the last moment the previously agreed IGA on the GST distribution, before discussing anything else.
But the states have been in discussion with the fed for two previous years over health reform at COAG. You can't tell me they are completely ignorant on what the fed is looking for. Time to get something on the ground at least in the way of standardisation of services. I suspect the states are still baulking on tying up funds in Specific Purpose Payments.
So what's new there!
Well from my accounting experience you have to have a plan before you can fund it... or is he one wanting to go right back to changing the IGA formula at the last moment.
Why so?
Again what's new here. Every gov does that at COAG negotiations. That's what COAG is all about.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/03/26/2199066.htm
Yes, like everything else this Government does, TALK! TALK! SPIN!SPIN! AND NO ACTION. They won't even get half way like all their other promises.
Isn't the main jist of these negotiations to secure health funding probably as a larger SPP, that can't be redirected to other areas eg leaving health supplies low because of unpaid suppliers as in NSW, BUT still managed and delivered by the states, but to some sort of national standard?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?