- Joined
- 24 May 2009
- Posts
- 3,252
- Reactions
- 255
So for what reason is Same Sex Marriage a benefit in society?
Why would the Government promote broken homes?
This creates a fallen society, where the Government needs to intervene.
As I said, the Gold standard is in line with natural law and should stay that way for all future generations.
Gay marriage isn’t about freedom, but state control.
it allows the state to increase its already considerable clout over both our personal/family lives and our consciences.
The ugly tactics of the loudest gay-marriage proponents are no accident: they speak to this illiberal heart of gay marriage.
There’s one question I’ve asked every liberal I’ve encountered in Australia, all of whom harangue me for my views on gay marriage: why are Western governments that are so allergic to freedom and autonomy passionately embracing gay marriage? They’ve all struggled to answer.
I think it’s because gay marriage chimes brilliantly with these governments’ insatiable desire to diminish the sovereignty of the family and intervene more in our personal lives, and to police what we think.
http://catallaxyfiles.com/2015/08/24/guest-post-brendan-oneill-heres-my-beef-with-gay-marriage/
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opi...e-branded-bigots/story-fnhulnf5-1227488996781
Such a classy lot -- https://www.aussiestockforums.com/f...23929&page=114&p=881149&viewfull=1#post881149
- - - - - - -
Transgenderism Is a Big Part of This Package, and how it is logically a big step to erasing all sex distinctions in law
If we become legally sexless, the implications are vast when it comes to how or whether the state will recognize family relationships such as mother, father, son, or daughter. There’s already a push to eliminate sex identification at birth.
Love’s Got Nothing to Do with State Interest in Marriage
“Love is love” is an empty slogan when it comes to state interest in marriage. How two people feel about one another is none of the state’s business.
The state’s interest is limited to the heterosexual union because that’s the only union that produces the state’s citizenry.
And it still is, whether the union happens traditionally or in a petri dish.
Each and every one of us””equally and without exception””only exists through the heterosexual union.
In any free and functioning society, there is a state interest in encouraging as much as possible those who sire and bear us to be responsible for raising us.
The Kids Are Not Alright.
Same-Sex Marriage Commodifies Children.
Whenever a parent is missing””for whatever reason””a child feels a primal wound.
In this respect, parents belong to their children more than children belong to their parents. We ought to recognize that privileges of civil marriage should ultimately exist for children, not for adults.
Children have the right to know their origins and not to be treated as commodities.
The “marriage equality” agenda requires that such children bear that burden alone and repress their primal wound in silence.
Why would the Government promote broken homes?
This creates a fallen society, where the Government needs to intervene.
As I said, the Gold standard is in line with natural law and should stay that way for all future generations.
Gay marriage isn’t about freedom, but state control.
it allows the state to increase its already considerable clout over both our personal/family lives and our consciences.
The ugly tactics of the loudest gay-marriage proponents are no accident: they speak to this illiberal heart of gay marriage.
There’s one question I’ve asked every liberal I’ve encountered in Australia, all of whom harangue me for my views on gay marriage: why are Western governments that are so allergic to freedom and autonomy passionately embracing gay marriage? They’ve all struggled to answer.
I think it’s because gay marriage chimes brilliantly with these governments’ insatiable desire to diminish the sovereignty of the family and intervene more in our personal lives, and to police what we think.
http://catallaxyfiles.com/2015/08/24/guest-post-brendan-oneill-heres-my-beef-with-gay-marriage/
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opi...e-branded-bigots/story-fnhulnf5-1227488996781
Such a classy lot -- https://www.aussiestockforums.com/f...23929&page=114&p=881149&viewfull=1#post881149
- - - - - - -
Transgenderism Is a Big Part of This Package, and how it is logically a big step to erasing all sex distinctions in law
If we become legally sexless, the implications are vast when it comes to how or whether the state will recognize family relationships such as mother, father, son, or daughter. There’s already a push to eliminate sex identification at birth.
Love’s Got Nothing to Do with State Interest in Marriage
“Love is love” is an empty slogan when it comes to state interest in marriage. How two people feel about one another is none of the state’s business.
The state’s interest is limited to the heterosexual union because that’s the only union that produces the state’s citizenry.
And it still is, whether the union happens traditionally or in a petri dish.
Each and every one of us””equally and without exception””only exists through the heterosexual union.
In any free and functioning society, there is a state interest in encouraging as much as possible those who sire and bear us to be responsible for raising us.
The Kids Are Not Alright.
Same-Sex Marriage Commodifies Children.
Whenever a parent is missing””for whatever reason””a child feels a primal wound.
In this respect, parents belong to their children more than children belong to their parents. We ought to recognize that privileges of civil marriage should ultimately exist for children, not for adults.
Children have the right to know their origins and not to be treated as commodities.
The “marriage equality” agenda requires that such children bear that burden alone and repress their primal wound in silence.