- Joined
- 28 September 2007
- Posts
- 1,472
- Reactions
- 8
And why should it be confined to Gays?
I'm not saying you can't have children, I am just saying that the payment of support (such as baby bonus, FTB etc) should be restricted to married parents. A scheme like this would make it more of a disincentive for people to have children in bad situations:
1. It is too easy these days for teenagers to get 'knocked up', because the hard working tax payers of Australia are financing their bad decisions.
2. If there were bigger financial disincentives for people to get divorced, then people would firstly, think harder before having children and secondly, be less likely to divorce for trivial reasons.
My wife and sister are both teachers, and both of them swear that 95% of the 'horror students' that they encounter daily come from the 2 backgrounds i have listed above.
More incentives need to be given for people to bring children up in a stable environment, and the fact is that a responsible mother and father are the only ones who can do this. I agree that the 'old fashioned' marriage is a thing of the past, so I'm not saying you have to spend $20grand on a big hoohaa. But i think that there should be a binding contract on parents before they bring a child into the world, so that the best interests of that child are always put first.
There is a reason that humans were created to produce with a male/female relationship, and that is why homosexual relationships can never expect exactly equal rights.
That's actually a quite serious point that I brought up earlier, i.e. where will it all end if we do not confine 'marriage' to a man and a woman?
The likelihood of genetic defects in a union between first cousins is considerably increased. And if that relationship were to be sanctioned, what would be next? Siblings being allowed to marry?
I remain suspicious. If gay and lesbian want to get married, go on ahead. But they shouldn't mess with the rule of law.
Kids need a mother and a father. You can't legislate that away.
I think it's a wedge with a thin end, and a bit of a con job besides.
I really don't understand why people get their knickers in such a knot over gay marriage. These couples still have the same relationship all that changes is a piece of paper that says they are married. Big deal.
Yes, it is indeed. But a few generations ago, no one would have thought we'd have homosexuals wanting to marry.Allowing same sex marriage hardly opens the door for incestuous marriages. I think that even comparing the two is a bit over the top and a bit of a weak argument. It's a pretty big jump.
Exactly. So why are the homosexual people making such a big fuss about wanting that piece of paper?
It's not heterosexuals who have brought on the discussion!
lol, you're kidding yourself if you think making it so you have to be married to receive benefits will change any of the above points, in fact it will probably make it worse, the people who need it the most will suffer - meaning more kids will be put in bad situations & environments and it would not stop others from exploiting the system.
I pay my taxes (probably more then most), contribute to society in many different ways and am in a very strong and stable relationship that has been going for over 10 years but shouldn't be eligible for tax benefits for my kids because I'm not married? And a lot of my friends are in the same situation.
I really don't understand why people get their knickers in such a knot over gay marriage. These couples still have the same relationship all that changes is a piece of paper that says they are married. Big deal.
The fact is, eventually we need to start preventing bad parents from having kids. 'Chuck a bit of chlorine in the gene pool' so to speak. The world is filling up with dropkicks!
... I hope I never see the day of this being legalized in Australia.
Yes, it is indeed. But a few generations ago, no one would have thought we'd have homosexuals wanting to marry.
And you have selectively quoted from what I have earlier said which was a passing on of a comment I had heard alleging that 'all that should be needed for two people to marry should be that they love each other'.
Plenty of people think they love each other, including those in incestuous relationships.
And why should it be confined to Gays?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?