What statistics are this graph based upon and why does it end 11 years ago?
Originally posted by StockGuru
"What statistics are this graph based upon..."
Uh 'Guru', You there? The graph has a heading. It states All Crimes presumably in Australia because I don't know why helicart would post stats from another country . What more do you want the graph to say, name every crime in the Crimes Act!!
The reason more recent data is not found is because it does not exist!Would be nice to see something a little more current but these stats are not always easy to find. I'm tipping the representation would be very similar today with the middle eastern cultures still right up the top especially organised crime involving drugs, rebirthing of cars, credit card/identity fraud etc.
Originally posted by StockGuru
I would like to know the source of the statistics, or do you just believe any graph that is posted on the internet? For all I know someone could have made it up. I could make a similar graph in Photoshop in about 10 minutes.
Originally posted by Rederob
The reason more recent data is not found is because it does not exist!
Only Victoria publishes country of birth data for offenders. WA uses a "looks like" identification process and classifies offenders on appearance into 10 groups.
Australian born rank very high in the crime statistics - 10th out of the 26 countries listed.
That aside, here are the "facts" in relation to migrants:
1. The crime rate of foreign-born population is lower than that of the native-born
2. The arrest rate of immigrant groups varies widely and also differs from arrest rate in their country of origin
3. The crime rate of second generation of migrants is higher than that of their
parents’ generation and this rate approximates the crime rates of the native-born population
4. Members of the foreign-born population are victims of crime more often than members of the native-born population, and
5. Some foreign-born groups are involved in organised crime.
You actually asked what the statistics were based on not for the source but you'll find it below anyway.
I haven't checked if Helicart owns the web page below Stockguru but I'm tipping he wouldn't bother going to the trouble you suggest.
http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=991&page=0
Dr Dick Crane is a General Surgeon, Endoscopist and Medico-Legal Consultant based in Sydney & Penrith. He has a background of service in the Army in Vietnam and is a frequent contributor to "letters to the editor" pages on such subjects as immigration, crime, heroin trials, Aboriginal health, tobacco. On the subject of his research into Youth Suicide, Medicare & Psychology, he recently contributed to a major piece on the Insight page of The Sydney Morning Herald about mental health and had a letter published in the SMH.
To enable a logical analysis of the asset/liability of immigrants from various countries, I have derived an indicator called the Criminal Representation Ratio (CRR). Using population and prison figures provided by the AIC and the ABS, the number of prisoners born in Australia per 100,000 adult population is obtained and given a CRR of one. Similar figures are then obtained for prisoners born in a number of representative countries for the Australian immigration program and compared with the Australian-born figures and given a CRR related to the Australian figure. A CRR greater than one indicates a crime involvement rate higher than that of Australian-born criminals.
I provide links from time to time. Your challenge is to falsify my claims, which should be rather easy given your cockiness.The charts' sources are in their properties....I have no reason to conceal anything.....unlike Chairman Red who still hasn't managed to find the data he bases his righteous indignation and slandering of other forumites on....
Bobby
I know what you intended and understand the point you are making.
What you had a chance to say was that it is a fact that radio stations are repeating false claims about how much refugees get from Centrelink.
That is a factual statement.
I chose not to respond to this because I was unwilling to become engaged in yet another silly exchange...... and readers will often assume a fact when none exists. Here's a classic example; "Julia don't they make more than the retirees?" The inference is that refugees get more than retirees. The fact is that a refugee will attract a social security benefit at exactly the same rate as any other eligible beneficiary warranting that entitlement.
what population do we want to stabilise this country at? where will we finally say "enough, the country is full, the cities are strained, infrastructure is collapsing, the water is running out and we need to time to stabilise and take stock of what kind of society we want going into the future"?
Originally posted by StockGuru
"Sorry if the research of someone whose claim to fame is that he is a frequent "Letters to the Editor" contributor does not impress me."
I provide links from time to time.
keep your hands over your ears, shout lalalala and everything will be ok.
I chose not to respond to this because I was unwilling to become engaged in yet another silly exchange.
Endorse Rederob's info as above.
Anyone genuinely wanting to know this can find all the information on the Centrelink website.
By the way, most crimes are not reported, and of those that are, an overwhelming majority do not lead to a conviction (because nobody was charged in the first place).
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.