How did the loss of the RIO contract effect these guys books?
How did the loss of the RIO contract effect these guys books?
Sorry my mistake is this the one?
http://www.forgegroup.com.au/announcements/41z7psjdhhynmt.pdf
I was not aware they lost this job and can not find any information on it.
I was under the impression there were a few. Perhaps it was not as significant as it might sound for FGE. I'm sure Roger will know.
FGE to report on Tuesday and should be extremely interesting. FGE for the half year were sitting on a nice pile of cash ~ $69,000,000 up from ~ $39,000,000 the pcp, upgraded guidence for the half year is for NPAT of $25m-$27m.
FGE has been very disciplined in the search for new aquisitions and up until this point and has not found a suitable candidate.
The question I want answered is will a larger dividend pay out ratio signal the growth of FGE is slowing down or will it signal CLO building a war chest to take over FGE?
* CLO has 33.58% of FGE and would thus benefit from a larger dividend pay out ratio or special dividend.
* Mr Neil Siford the CFO of CLO has just been appointed to the board of FGE as a non-executive director.
I will be reading the annual report with interest Tuesday night.
We all know forge has been a good company but what is it worth? Ever since the a share price hit the $7 mark its been in slow decline.
I think its worth around $7 FWIW.
What is the basis for concluding it's worth $7?
A (so far) consistent ROE of 30%, pay-out ratio increasing in coming years 25% currently adopted and a conservative required return.
$25-27m BEFORE tax = $17.5 to $19m AFTER tax. H1 NPAT $21m AFTER tax. A pretty significant half-on-half fall!
Revenue was $204m in the first half, and only $200m in the update. Corresponding figures from last year was $112m and $135m. So half-on-half top line growth was 20%, 51%, -2%...
We all know forge has been a good company but what is it worth? Ever since the a share price hit the $7 mark its been in slow decline.
ROE for the last 4 FY Results, 17.90, 18.58, 31.94, 33.28
ROE for the last 4 HY Results 14.73, 13.62, 24.29, 19.02
Last half yearly has already shown a decrease in ROE and current forecasts show a continuation. Do you think 30% is a conservative enough estimate for an entire cycle or are you forecasting and playing earnings momentum?
If you are using the formula that I think you are then you are implying a growth rate of 22.5% Does that sound consistent with the overall picture and growth in mining infrastructure spend or are you forecasting and playing FGE gaining market share?
Do you know how far into the future these assumptions are implied to last by the valuation formula you are using? Do they match your assumptions for the business?
Sorry my mistake is this the one?
http://www.forgegroup.com.au/announcements/41z7psjdhhynmt.pdf
I was not aware they lost this job and can not find any information on it.
Very crafty comments.
Few 'value investors' understands that the underlying premise of their valuation technique implies perpetual growth.
Scary what can happen when you ask a little question
There does seem to be a fair bit of work around over there in WA.
What I heard was that RIO had opted to build their own shacks for workers rather than pay Forge who where perhaps getting a little expensive.
It was a comment from some analyst on TV, I think!
Not inside information yet to be announced!!!
I thought you guys following it closely would be all over it if it was substantial.
Seems substance is lacking.
And then they dismiss DCF as trying to forecast too far into the future.
Yes, I found it rather odd sounding too. Hence the question.Just wondering, with what building licence are rio going to use?, which trades, managers, what tools etc.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?