- Joined
- 2 May 2007
- Posts
- 4,720
- Reactions
- 2,957
Anyone else on here subscribe to FP and think that their Australian Mining reports are written absolutely terrible?
Seriously - these reports wouldn't pass a year 7 English exam!
There's no beginning, middle or end, no story, no introduction - just a jumble of random technical jargon.
Gives me a headache trying to get through them!
I have one month left on my subscription and definitely wont be re-subscribing.
I think if you see the return to its own shareholders FAT has provided will tell you the story - Who can not they teach.
If FAT was so smart to recommend the right scrip then at least they would have made some money for themselves and their shareholders.
The same applies to Bell Potter - Look their share performance.
If you carefully read ASF postings and put the ramping ones into bin, IMO you would get more value for money from your time with ASF. I must forewarn you that it could be an addiction for some people to be on line with ASF forum