- Joined
- 31 August 2009
- Posts
- 376
- Reactions
- 1
Think you were right nomore4's, Hawks don't have a ruckman and the game was lost there, good signs again by Gumby, Hille played a great game and will be a starting point for his year I reckon.
All round it was played hard by the boys as you would expect after the serves they copped during the week, still not convinced for the rest of the season as the Hawks looked woeful, Roughead had a shocker and didn't even look interested, Fletcher still having a great year, good to see him take fullback again, even better to see him have a great game and take toll for Rougheads laziness.
lol, Hawthorn have more problems then a lack of a decent ruckman, everything that won us the 2008 flag is gone - pressure on the ball carrier, fitness and ability to run & break the lines, our attitude & aggression - we are extremely soft in all areas atm, our tackling is pathetic.
Essendon clearly outplayed the hawks all night a deserved the victory but the fact we were in touching distance at 3 quarter time probably highlights where Essendon are currently at as well. Hawthorn should have been 60 points down at that stage, there is no doubt the scoreboard flattered us.
I'm absolutly bleeding, Bombers win and i can't even get a look! ARGGGHHHHH!
Port Adelaide at Etihad Duckman, be interesting to watch, a few more injuries after the weekend, Dyson and Hurley although Hurley is going to be close to playing by the sounds of it, Pears and Reimers looking to be back sooner than they thought, Hille was cleared of his rough conduct charge so he will play, hopefully the Hawks game has given him the confidence he needed, he was really in great form before the knee on Anzac day last year.
I listened to ABC's Sunday Inquisition with Stan Alves, Sam Lane and Gerard Whateley - they said that the Bombers have to stop "getting themselves up" like they did against Carlton and Hawks and bring the same intensity and energy to all their games. They've proven they are capable of doing it.
Here here!!
Duckman
That's funny cause I notice Knights is trying to talk it up for this weeks game against Port.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/knights-predicts-port-fireworks/story-e6frf9jf-1225862019407
I don't think I explained their conversation very well.
The conversation started by Gerard, Sam and Stan all agreeing that it must be exasperating to be a Bombers supporter, such is the huge difference in energy, effort and attitude from game to game, week to week. Their point is that they have "set the bar" for their supporters and it is no longer good enough just to "get themselves up" for certain games only to turn off the following week.
I don't care that Knights is "talking it up" for this game. All I want to see and others want to see, is a consistent energy level each and every week. If Knights can get the boys going by bringing up old scores, all well and good.
Duckman
Important game for the Bombers credibility today.
A win over POrt is long, long overdue.
Duckman
Another shocking umpiring display!
Dont follow either side but was hoping the Bombers would win.
Duckman what was your thoughts on the umpiring?
Also wondering in the game of AFL...Wouldn't be better if tackled & off your feet that you are to release the ball & take no part in play until you've regained your footing?
I dont think there would be as many ball ups or stopages either.
I know it's a great game so why would you want to change it but somethings just piss me off.
A great tackle only for the player tackled being able to lie on or push the ball out to a team mate doesn't sit right.
Maybe if the umpires did their job consistently it wouldn't matter.
I've played both amatuer rugby & football.
Your thoughts?
Hey Jancha
I didn't see the game only heard the MMM call.
I don't know about the umpiring, I can't comment. Essendon again seemed to be let down by poor decision making and didn't run the game out as fit as the opposition.
It was anopther performance where the commentators would say things like...."The Bombers don't seem on their game", "There is a lack of intensity from the Bombers", and "Essendon are just waiting for something to happen".
Well done to Port for saying within striking distance.
As for your rule changes, I think if the umpires made the right calls it would be better. We still need to make the underlying fundamental - "Not to be caught with the ball". If you get caught but had no prior opportunity - ball up. If you did and haven't disposed of it correctly - holding the ball or dropping the ball.
Duckman
I think it was NLM who tunnelled the ball under himself. It was a technical throw imo. But in the overall situation of the game it was a poor decision. There were other things previous to this that cost us the game.One free to Port in last few minutes of the game when Essendon shovelled out the ball from the bottom of the pack & got pinged for a throw didn't help their cause.
The game was there for the taking and Port took it, end of story, no good sooking about umpires etc, the Bombers had their chances and just couldn't put them away unfortunately, another win goes begging.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?