- Joined
- 14 November 2005
- Posts
- 1,319
- Reactions
- 12
New players like Howlett and Gumbleton showed some encouraging signs and had a good go. However experienced players like Winderlich and Dyson were very poor.
Based on that performance we need to make some changes next week. Lovett-Murray back in. Davey out, he continually drops the ball and is currently light years away from being an AFL footballer. After watching his brother play on Saturday, the difference is stark. Essendon want him to be another Aaron Davey, Rioli, Lovett, Leon Davis but he's just not the guy. Bring Reimers back in and tell the bugger to play defence or stay in the magoos.
Duckman
Those newbies went surprisingly well. Melksham especially.
McVeigh should probably come back in depending on recovery I suppose.What changes for WC on Friday? Hurley is due back in - is he automatic inclusion? Do you give McVeigh another week off after his five days in hospital? Monfries/Neagle - do we need another forward or is Hurley the extra forward.
Duckman
Essendon defender Michael Hurley was best on ground for the Bendigo Bombers with four goals.
Hurley is eligible to play for the Bombers in their clash with West Coast on Friday night after a three-game club ban for allegedly assaulting a taxi driver after The Footy's Show's grand-final program last year.
Yesterday, he starred in the forward line for the Bombers, along with Alwyn Davey, who produced some fine defensive pressure. Jason Laycock, in the ruck, was also impressive.
Hocking is a dark horse. He gets better each week and is almost unrecogniseable from 2 seasons ago - not blessed with great leg speed but is in the Watson mould of wonderful speed of ball movement. Our ruckmen are still slightly off the pace - but Ryder showed glimpses of form tonight.
Duckman
Surprised McVeigh didn't go straight back in. Maybe a sign of the strength in the team at the moment.
Ah, disregard. Not on. Looks like a late night for me.The game is on at bloody 11.30pm in Sydney tonight.
Is it on Foxtel in a bar in Sydney somewhere?
Is it on Foxtel in a bar in Sydney somewhere?
Seems like this game is not on anywhere until 11.30 ish.We are going to have to find a place that shows the AFL games live. I think there is one in Newtown...
I hope that Hams isn't the Easgles version of Freo's Michael Barlow - a mature age rookie playing AFL for the first time who blows away his opponents. It will be an interesting game. The ruck divisions for both sides are potentially fantastic on paper, but on current form - not so good. The forward lines for both are still very much works in progress. I think Essendon has a distinct advantage in the backline, but Eagles might have small advantage in the midfield. Add in Eagles home ground advantage and Essendon's woeful away record and it makes for a good matchup.
Kenna's made the comment of "sneaking into the eight". They MUST win tonight if they are serious about finals.
Putty - good call about Hocking and Smokin Joe. Both have that "lopey" run. Are you going to the game?
Duckman
Bit quiet today boys?
Do Essendon even have ruckmen? If they do, I didn't see them last night!Not only did Cox/NicNat dominate the hitouts, but the "hit outs to advantage" was huge! They were great in general play as well.
West Coast pretty much laid down in the second half. Despite the half time gap, Essendon had ample opportunity to win the match.
Bit quiet today boys?
Lets hope he stays injury free for a 19 year old he has a amazing future hopefully the Eagles will keep a close eye on him as he develops.
That's a bit harsh, while Hille was smashed at the hitouts I thought he was one of the few Bombers that actually had a crack last night, he is just not in Cox or NicNat's class atm.
This I agree with, Essendon had chances to kick 5 or 6 goals in the 3rd quarter and get themselves back in the game but couldn't find the big sticks.
West Coast weren't much chop last night imo, plenty of turnovers etc but to be able to blow the Bombers out of the water like that in the second quarter highlights just where the bombers are at atm. Most of Essendon goals in that first quarter were from very poor West Coast turnovers and besides them the bombers never looked like scoring.
I was going to comment after Essendon's win last week about how ordinary they looked against the blues even though they won but thought I would give them the benefit of the doubt and wait to see how they preformed against the Eagles. The Blues were woeful last week and Essendon only just managed to win it really and after last nights game I can see why.
There is pretty much no forward line atm, Gumby looks like an athletic tall forward but he has no idea how to get hold of the footy, Williams spends more time trying to get kicks up the ground cause he can't get a kick in the 50 cause it never gets there with any decent delivery, why not play him from the goal square to at least provide some sort of target? Also missed a player like Davey/Jetta (even though I don't really rate either) to provide a bit of pace and forward line pressure.
How Prismall couldn't get a game last night with both Stanton & McVeigh out is beyond me, at least he can get his hands on the footy and has a crack. Way too many passengers for the Bombers atm and there is no doubt they have taken a huge step backwards this year so far.
Bombers could be 1 or 2 and alot in a few weeks with hard games coming up, and the thing that annoys me is even though Hawthorn are playing a lot better footy then Essendon atm we could also be 1 or 2 and a lot in a few weeks.
I'm not sure that we've taken a huge step backwards this year - because realistically with the retirement of Lloyd, the changeover to the new forward line and with the draw I don't think Essendon were ever likely to figure in the finals anyway. We overachieved last year. A huge step backwards is winning a grand final and then not even playing finals the following year!Let's keep things in perspective Nomores - this is a side that was bundled out of the finals by 100 points last September.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?