chris1983 said:ahh its the mineral sand licenses
Halba said:hi i think u tonnage is in the several tens of millions of tonnes
just their anomaly A:
1000m*800m*3.5(drill hole density)*35m(average thickness) = 100mT
Say average grade is low like Uramin - 0.015%
100mT @ 0.015 = 33million pounds
of course this is in 1 anomaly, they say 21 anomalies on their tenements, and hopefully >20% are u bearing, with potential calcrete or granite high grade zones?
What is the effect on BMN@ERN if labour conference refused uranium mining in AUS. [April this year].chris1983 said:From the message..It sounds like it could be a very "significant" deposit. They like that word significant..thats a pretty big statement. I like the look of Erongo. Oil/Uranium/Mineral Sands. Bring it on. Now give me some good uranium samples to push us past $1.
Agreed. Johny Howard consider Australian is the 51 state of the United States of A.....Halba said:not going to happen .... foreign relations with the Rofworld
Halba said:not going to happen sydney
its pretty much a done deal
too many billions of dollars at stake & foreign relations with the Rofworld
As of this week the probability of this going ahead in all states is about nearly 95%
Chinese could get will with bmn & ern to secure uranium.mmmmining said:Agreed. Johny Howard consider Australian is the 51 state of the United States of A.....
Ruddy speak Chinese....
Unless someone draw a line over the Olympic Dams, divided into two, give one half to the Americans, and the other half to the Chinese....
Not a chance. They prefer to get a piece of land somewhere in Namibia, and mobilize 1bn Chinese to dig it up...sydney1963 said:Chinese could get will with bmn & ern to secure uranium.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.