Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

Equititrust?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jump to new
No Trust said:
(ii) Any statement of the assets and liabilities or statement of financial position of the following persons in any period from 1 July, 2013 for any of:
(i) Mr Tucker;
(ii) Mr Tucker and his wife Jennifer Tucker jointly;
(iii) Any superannuation fund in which Mr Tucker has an interest

https://www.comcourts.gov.au/file/Federal/P/QUD944/2016/3777218/event/28977661/document/979446
Click to expand...

There is a key to the puzzle within the Federal Court Order and one the insurers are "surely likely to stumble across it"... ??Well after this post they definitely will... They have much better law firms acting for them...
 
Last edited:
No Trust said:
In the framework of the Australian Solicitors’ Conduct Rules (ASCR), the issues arising are fairly black and white. Misleading the court, whether by way of a perjured sworn statement or a submission from the bar table is a clear violation of the fundamental duty outlined by rule 4.1.2, to be “honest and courteous in all dealings in the course of legal practice”.
Rule 19.1, “A solicitor must not deceive or knowingly or recklessly mislead the Court”, is obviously relevant as well.
The point needs to be reinforced, however, that the more amorphous “fundamental duties” at the commencement of the ASCR are not just introductory window dressing. It is quite possible to engage in conduct serious enough to justify removal from the profession without breaking one express conduct rule.

http://www.qls.com.au/files/cf785cfd-de50-4be7-b2eb-a44301006390/140311_Misleading_statements.pdf
Click to expand...
Tick Tock... Tick Tick Tock Tock... ?There are clues everywhere...
 
No Trust said:
Oh the Skullduggery

(c) Any memoranda, diary notes, files notes, records or minutes of meetings, PowerPoint presentations, letters, facsimiles, emails or any other correspondence prepared by, or sent or received by, Mr Tucker, concerning meetings with officers of the BOSI on or after 1 July, 2009, including but not limited to a meeting on or about 7 October 2011;

(d) Any memoranda, diary notes, files notes, records or minutes of meetings, PowerPoint presentations, letters, facsimiles, emails or any other correspondence prepared by, or sent or received by, Mr Tucker, concerning meetings with officers of ASIC, on or after 1 July, 2009, at which the affairs of the Company were discussed, including but not limited to a meeting on or about 10 October 2011;

7 October 2011 Tucker meets with BOSI

10 October 2011 Tucker meets with ASIC

12 October 2011 Tucker ousted as director

19 October 2011 ASIC and Federal Police raid Equititrust

http://www.couriermail.com.au/busin...fa6459fcb?sv=81420135f64919e9522784c49cbd3ed6

"By this point, the relationship between the two men had become "strained" and McIvor ousted Tucker on October 12."

http://www.couriermail.com.au/ipad/...d7aa64c99?sv=1cefd2ea9b6101ac0a852ae21c562c96
Click to expand...
Read what Tucker says about the litigation against the Meridien directors who owed the "EPF" $12M Dollars... Suing on behalf of Equititrust to protect the investors then trousering the proceeds of the EPF with the former CEO of Equititrust... The CONFLICT OF INTEREST is strong with this one...

No Cookies | The Courier Mail

Breaking News Headlines for Brisbane and Queensland | Courier Mail
www.couriermail.com.au www.couriermail.com.au
 
A look back at the Federal Court File for the Examination and Production of Documents, particularly as it relates to Tucker, shows the extent to which he tried to avoid producing documents and appearing for his public humiliation... The light was finally shone on his nefarious activities...


 
Tucker was told his day of reckoning would come many moons ago... He arrogantly thought he could get away with this monumental scam and not be exposed in such a public manner... The media attention will only intensify... Keep counting your losses “Davey Boy”...
 
This statement of claim is something the insurance industry will use for years as a precedent to print out and line the bottom of their members budgie cages.. It analogous to bank robbers claiming indemnity for their crimes...
 
No Trust said:
Liquidator

If the liquidator wants to redeem any credibility they will commence proceedings against McIvor and Tucker and have them both brought before a court for a public examination...

Don't be fooled, Tucker (Mr Conflict of Interest) was up to his eye balls in this mess alongside his old mate McIvor and both need to be put into a witness box...

Time for these two idiots to tell the truth before a judge...
Click to expand...
TICK 1612958703026.png
 
WHATS GOING ON HERE ???​

It appears a contractor is about to get screwed... The Civil Works contractor issued a Statutory Demand last year.

Essentially a filed and served statutory demand alleges there is no disupute as to the debt being owed and demands payment within a precribed time. (21 days)

The contractor must have some solid footing to have been able to apply to the court to have the company wound up...

Statutory demands – how to make them and how to resist them

Access to publications and insights from our team of legal experts. Subscribe to our monthly newsletter, CBPFocus, for industry news delivered to your inbox
www.cbp.com.au www.cbp.com.au


There is more to this story... Why would a real estate salesman like Greg Bell be undertaking this development in his own name ??? Bell states that the financier is stepping in to help protect him as well ???




1613052880411.png


1613053035534.png

1613053115944.png

1613053184441.png
1613053263318.png
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top