Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

Equititrust?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jump to new
IF ONE LIKES SEEING "WHO DUNNIT MYSTERY MOVIES", HERE ARE A COUPLE OF FICTION VIDEOS.....

THE NON FICTION MOVIE IS BEING RELEASED 2021, AT A COURT NEAR YOU.............. LOL

Quoted from 'No Trust' Post :
Apr 3, 2019 #4935 - Page 247

Quote: No Trust
"It’s good to see that at least one of the partners of Tucker and Cowan agrees to the use of the Legal System to settle disputes. The liquidators of Equititrust are doing just that.

QUOTE: Tucker & Cowan “have a range of contacts around the world” is mentioned in the video.

Does that include Hong Kong and The British Virgin Islands ?
Just Asking for a friend.." LOL :D


David Tucker of Tucker & Cowen in Brisbane talks about MSI Global Alliance





Richard Cowen on using the Queensland legal system to best effect in disputes





Great Actors !!! VERY CONVINCING.... !!!

The Best Acting by these two will be in Qld Supreme Court, 2021.

:D:p:p
 
And here it is... Tucker having a crack at his insurers... DESPERATION HAS SET IN... There’s a saying that says, when gypsies fall off a wagon, they clutch for the straw...

Tucker’s attempt to join his insurers is a good example of clutching for air... ???

85DAC4E2-3DD9-49D4-B091-E9EDC819065E.jpeg28926213-A580-46C3-9F83-F45E02BFD72B.jpeg
 
This may explain things in Tucker’s own words...???

No Trust said:
The depths that Tucker is willing to go, know no bounds...

Having concocted a secret scheme to enrich himself to the tune of millions of dollars, off the back of Equititrust investors, with Kennedy, another director and former CEO, he then has the temerity to go to the “company’s” insurance policy to cover the cost of being sued due to his own malfeasance...

Tucker sucked the golden teat of Equititrust for over a decade then f#cked the vulnerable investors over to only go back and ask to be covered by Equititrust’s directors and officers policy...

The gall to actually attempt to do this is gobsmacking...

Even his own law firms insurers rejected him... That’s saying something...

It’s no wonder he’s threatening to declare bankruptcy in the event of a judgement against him...
View attachment 86120
Click to expand...




Warr87 said:
Can you explain the importance of him trying to join the insurers ?
Click to expand...
 
No Trust said:
Tucker it seems is very weak in the underbelly at the moment as he never in his wildest dreams thought the Courier Mail would ever get a hold of the Federal Court Transcript of his Public Humiliation...

His threat to declare bankruptcy in an affidavit may be the stupidest thing he’s ever done. As insurers, banks etc look upon this as a fait accompli.

Stress induced behaviour can be detrimental to ones finances and hair pigmentation it seems...

View attachment 86200
Click to expand...
 
lets see if i get this then. his (alleged) fraudulent behaviour caused the collapse of the company. he is being sued for that, so he is attempting to join the insurers in the case against him? or is it rather that the insurers are being sued for money covering the collapse and instead of him being liable he is trying to hide behind the insurers so they are essentially liable, not him? either way, I'm assuming the insurers can say no to joining parties? from what i can read, the isurers aren't liable for a payout anyway given the cause of the collapse isn't covered by the policy, therefore wouldn't it be on the back of the directors/executive (which is him?)?

sorry,i'm pretty good with legal stuff but i'm not that intimate with this case so it's a little confusing lol.
 
This was just filed in the Supreme Court, and may help. If you read the affidavit from Page 94 on, the letters from the Insurers lawyers Barry.Nilsson solicitors, denying cover is damning.... The issue of not providing cover in cases of FRAUD is fully covered and something I alerted this thread some time ago... Fraud is an exclusion to any Insurance Policy...

1608194604998.png1608194604998.png1608194604998.png


Rhett Kennedy, the lawyer for Insurers, appears to be extremely sharp.....




Warr87 said:
lets see if i get this then. his (alleged) fraudulent behaviour caused the collapse of the company. he is being sued for that, so he is attempting to join the insurers in the case against him? or is it rather that the insurers are being sued for money covering the collapse and instead of him being liable he is trying to hide behind the insurers so they are essentially liable, not him? either way, I'm assuming the insurers can say no to joining parties? from what i can read, the isurers aren't liable for a payout anyway given the cause of the collapse isn't covered by the policy, therefore wouldn't it be on the back of the directors/executive (which is him?)?

sorry,i'm pretty good with legal stuff but i'm not that intimate with this case so it's a little confusing lol.
Click to expand...
 
No Trust said:
This was just filed in the Supreme Court, and may help. If you read the affidavit from Page 94 on, the letters from the Insurers lawyers Barry.Nilsson solicitors, denying cover is damning.... The issue of not providing cover in cases of FRAUD is fully covered and something I alerted this thread some time ago... Fraud is an exclusion to any Insurance Policy...

View attachment 116509View attachment 116509View attachment 116509


Rhett Kennedy, the lawyer for Insurers, appears to be extremely sharp.....
Click to expand...
No Trust said:
This was just filed in the Supreme Court, and may help. If you read the affidavit from Page 94 on, the letters from the Insurers lawyers Barry.Nilsson solicitors, denying cover is damning.... The issue of not providing cover in cases of FRAUD is fully covered and something I alerted this thread some time ago... Fraud is an exclusion to any Insurance Policy...

View attachment 116509View attachment 116509View attachment 116509


Rhett Kennedy, the lawyer for Insurers, appears to be extremely sharp.....
Click to expand...

No Trust, could it be that having the insurers declining the indemnity covers as way to tell the liquidator it will be a phyrrhic victory even what they are suing is successful?
 
Now that's a sobering letter from the lawyers for Insurer Lexon to Richard Cowen and partners... Page 2 highlighted is a killer and sets out what Tucker did whilst his "partner aided and abetted" the actions... (their words not mine)

1608213576803.png1608213580229.png1608213583877.png
3C747025-7A69-46CE-8BC0-77E4AF4EC24C.jpeg70FDB81F-ACB4-46C8-80B8-68D9D96229C1.jpegDCBC1A86-A3E4-4716-9931-733A69A0500B.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • B0A27E77-5618-47E8-A225-A3B264907237.jpeg
    B0A27E77-5618-47E8-A225-A3B264907237.jpeg
    221.4 KB · Views: 6
  • 0E54508D-EDEB-49F0-8E38-BB42942028FE.jpeg
    0E54508D-EDEB-49F0-8E38-BB42942028FE.jpeg
    375.9 KB · Views: 3
  • 96978BDB-9780-4040-9F62-39F165F46D45.jpeg
    96978BDB-9780-4040-9F62-39F165F46D45.jpeg
    278.9 KB · Views: 3
  • 3156E018-E96B-4CED-BF4D-AD7CE3189545.jpeg
    3156E018-E96B-4CED-BF4D-AD7CE3189545.jpeg
    141.7 KB · Views: 3
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top