Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

Equititrust?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jump to new
Tucker and Kennedy have announced that they are returning $17.5 Million to Equititrust investors with interest IMMEDIATELY...

It’s April Fools Day and as pleasant as the above scenario would be to all investors, these two fools will have to be dragged through the courts and media before the money is finally returned to its rightful owners.
 
There’s a bit more to the Tucker & Cowan litigation emerging in the background, and it ain’t pretty...

Chatter amongst the legal fraternity is that there is likely to be a claim made on the Qld Law Society Fidelity Fund in due course if allegations of breaches of s. 249 of The Legal Profession Act are proven.

The Legal Services Commissioner is now apparently aware of the allegations.
 
Now Add to Tucker, and McIvor.......

1. (John) Kenny & Co ( https://www.entrelaw.com/ ) , who now hides on Norfolk Island....
2. ...to this Picture with the Owner/s of the Sika Munzi, who BOTH hide at Hargreaves Ave, Chelmer QLD 4068.................
3. Mowbray House Childcare Centre, the founders in 1992....
4. 30+ Years, Criminal Tax Evasion + Criminal Corporate Financial Fraud.........
5. 25 Years of no legal retribution (yet) upon these garbage thieves............
6. ASIC and ATO received letters about these criminal fraudulent thieves in 1996, and ignored ALL correspondence.............

My Friend, will assist Liquidators, all in good time......... if requested.
 
Yes the Qld Law Society has been protecting the crooks for a long time.

Now we have the Legal Services Commission and they appear not to like media attention about investors allegedly being shafted via Solicitors Trust Accounts. They will only act if forced to.

The recent media attention regarding alleged breaches of s. 249 of The Legal Profession Act seems to have forced them to “at the least” have a look at the matter to see what’s transpired.

It’s their role to investigate matters of this nature and force the Queensland Law Society to look into Solicitors Trust Accounts.

They also have the power to commence an Own Motion Investigation.

My sources tell me the Legal Services Commissioner has received an extensive dossier related to the matter.

Remember Liquidators have a duty to report breaches of the law to both ASIC and other regulators.


Triple_Witching said:
QLS ignored similar written S.249 complaints in 1995 - 1996..........
Click to expand...
 
So Tucker & Cowan have to now file their defenses to the litigation launched by the liquidators.

Cowan’s pointing the finger at Tucker and says he wasn’t involved etc etc..

Yet defences will have to be filed by all.. Question is how do you try and defend the indefensible ?

As the saying goes it’s hard to polish a turd.
 
There’s something to Tucker’s testimony at the Public Examination where he asserts that he doesn’t know where his profit on the deal went and that he had not received any of the multimillion dollar bounty.

If he said he had received the benefit or part there of, would he have incriminated himself under any Australian Law ?
By saying the money is somehow floating in the atmosphere like ether. (It’s there but you just can’t see it) may be a devious way of trying to deny a linkage of benefit from the transaction.

No intelligent third party observer will buy this bullsh#t, it’s akin to saying the money is sitting in some kind of financial purgatory. Heaven if Tucker got to it anonymously downright hell if he’s publicly seen to have received it...

Somethings going on here and I think the liquidators are on to it...

Where’s the money Kennedy ?
 
The Tucker & Cowan litigation could have been a script for a B Grade soap opera if it weren’t actually true.

Tucker now having to fight the litigation with Cowan whilst Kennedy is ensconced in Hong Kong with the money is telling.

Tucker doesn’t realise it yet but he soon will, he was the Manchurian Candidate as was Cowan’s law firm.

May you all live in interesting times.
 
Why on earth did Tucker and Kennedy need an offshore British Virgin Islands shelf company to conceal their ownership of MS Asia.

This was a dirty, illegal enterprise on many levels and the promoters knew it.

If you’ve got nothing to hide, why all the hiding.
 
It’s good to see the Tucker & Cowan boys mired in litigation. Just where they need to be for the next bombshell about to be dropped...
 
Insiders confirm that the Tucker & Cowan boys and now Sole Practitioner (aka special counsel for hanging out the washing) in the Gap Brisbane, David Tucker were non too pleased with the recent media reporting of the litigation commenced by the liquidators.

The Courier Mail and Murdoch Press are not at all concerned by the faux outrage ...

Here’s a tip guys, don’t get involved in dodgy deals which involve your client’s. Lawyers should stick to being lawyers and not as Tucker says “getting back in the game” and “returning the favour” . Remember he said this about his former client who fed him and his firm untold amounts of legal work...
 
Last edited:
It’s good to see that at least one of the partners of Tucker and Cowan agrees to the use of the Legal System to settle disputes. The liquidators of Equititrust are doing just that.

 
Tucker & Cowan “have a range of contacts around the world” is mentioned in the video. Does that include Hong Kong and The British Virgin Islands ? Asking for a friend..
 
Note to Tucker & Cowan, Kennedy and Worrells the firm with no morals...

DFC34266-0BD4-4A4A-AA91-5A5786AFAA6E.jpeg
AD1D3A03-54DA-4742-93A5-808DC2826D4A.jpeg
 
And just when Tucker & Cowan thought it couldn’t get any worse, another major scandal is brewing involving a matter where they acted as solicitors.
 
If Worrells were up for being the friendly receiver for MS Asia and Tucker, how many other receivers have played the stooge for money in other cases where Tucker & Cowan Solicitors have been involved ?

It appears that more sh#t is floating to the surface as each day passes. The great thing about media exposure of scandals such as those involving Tucker, Kennedy and Tucker & Cowan is that people start coming out of the woodwork and start telling their stories and producing documents.

It’s an understatement to say that some solicitors are not model litigants and abuse the Queensland Legal System. Officers of the court (allegedly) cannot under any circumstances mislead the court.
 
Remember, this is what a solicitor of the Supreme Court of Queensland said under “oath” in the Federal Court of Australia when being publicly examined by the liquidators of Equititrust. Tucker was booted off the board due to his conflicts of interest. The penny must have finally dropped for imbecile McIvor.

16047AC9-D69C-4B11-8C1B-EFA71CB0091B.jpeg

Is this the kind of language you’d expect from an officer of the court speaking about his client who he had ongoing duties to as a solicitor and as a director ?

The sheer arrogance and disrespect to investors is gobsmacking. The investors were not some kind of tools in a game of revenge that Tucker wanted to take out on McIvor. The investors were innocent people who had worked hard all their lives and invested their retirement funds and Self Managed Superannuation Funds into Equititrust to then be made part of some depraved Machiavellian game of making Tucker “Feel Good”... Seriously, other peoples misery makes this guy feel good ???

I note zero empathy from Tucker towards any of the investors. I guess investors are just pawns in his little game.

As more emerges in the media over the coming weeks and months, Tucker will find that “others” who he thought were disempowered will be returning the favour not out of revenge, but through the delivery of justice.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top