- Joined
- 15 November 2004
- Posts
- 53
- Reactions
- 1
Very interesting little company with blue sky potentual if the ever get their act together. Very lumpy returns however make EOS hard to follow.
the ongoing development of a space debris and destruction system to protect orbiting satellites from damage from space junk
Exciting times:
The gap at $1.20 is now well and truly closed; following yesterday's reversal candle, today's gap-up looks more like the completion of a Morning Star, resulting in a break-away gap that may well remain open for a long time.
Ha ha, ramble away. EOS is a stock I'll never trade due to its reliance on fickle gov't contracts and low daily volume.
Your chart boxes are truly prodigious, but a little too jaundiced for my tastes. Keep up the good work.
Ha ha, ramble away. EOS is a stock I'll never trade due to its reliance on fickle gov't contracts and low daily volume.
Your chart boxes are truly prodigious, but a little too jaundiced for my tastes. Keep up the good work.
Sometimes it pays to ignore the noise and just focus on the chart. (Sorry if the colours offend some aesthetics. They came as standard with the software and I got used to them.) The chart doesn't tell what attracted the sudden volume-buying. Could be the connection to AKP via the maligned Barts. But as long as the sp rises I don't need to know or care.
EOS expects to be profitable in the first half of 2016, and to hold in excess of $6 million in cash at 30 June 2016.
Agree; the chart has attracted my attention and I had hoped to snap some up on pullback.
While assessing whether it might be advisable to "chase", i.e. bid higher than I normally would, I have come across the Auditors' qualification on page 11. Make of it what you want, it's not that uncommon for Auditors covering their backs; I know, I've been an Auditor myself at one stage of my professional life. Still, it keeps me from becoming too exuberant even though the collaboration sounds promising.
Another interesting fact I discovered is a connection to AKP at board level.
Its interesting that as a former auditor somebody far more qualified than most to understand company accounts you choose to focus primarily on charts rather than company accounts. It seems to me a curious position and a waste of your talents. Care to explain the choice?
I don't trust Gov'mints either, but charts are a different matter
Let's see the current resistance at $1.30 break, and $1.50 beckons. Sure, volume is still low and there are a couple of gaps below, but if the lack of volume is caused by retreating supply (as seems to be the case) then I accept the gap as break-away.
I start buying;
Let's see if the new board member, an Air Marshal, creates enough good will to crack the $1.30 barrier.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?