It sounds like you are living in an alternate reality, your concerns describe the Twitter Musk is ending and why he is ending it, projection much.Challenged no, cancelled yes.
The thing is Horace, is that many on the moderately opposite side of you have been being cancelled for the last 4 or 5 years.Challenged no, cancelled yes.
I for one say that let everybody have their point of view, left or right and have reasonable discussions.... Within what is lawful of course.
Clearly it is relevant to you. Twitter is not the point here, it's the breaking of the one sided big tech monopoly on thought and public discourse.Fine, just don't criticise Musk, Tesla , SpaceX or any other of his businesses.
Anyway, it's irrelevant to me as I don't use Twitter.
I'm wondering how you can make such categorical statements if it's you don't use and have no experience on the platform?Fine, just don't criticise Musk, Tesla , SpaceX or any other of his businesses.
Anyway, it's irrelevant to me as I don't use Twitter.
He posted articles whereby shock horror as the boss of Tesla/spaceX etc Elon Musk likes his employees to talk a certain way about their employer.I'm wondering how you can make such categorical statements if it's you don't use and have no experience on the platform?
He posted articles whereby shock horror as the boss of Tesla/spaceX etc Elon Musk likes his employees to talk a certain way about their employer.
Free factoid: every government employee in Australia in both state and federal have as a condition of their employment major restrictions on what they can say when and where about the government.
So do most big organisations, look at the sacking of Israel Folau for speaking about his religion.
None of this should be a shock to any adult who has ever worked for a living but it comes as a shock to @SirRumpole
His transgressions are all in your imagination, the guy hasn't even had time to unpack his lunch box yet, RUOK??The fact that such regulations exist at all proves the point that we don't have freedom of speech at all, so it's pretty useless to claim that a repressor like Musk is going to improve the situation.
Whistleblowers in any area who point out real deficiencies in a system should be encouraged and protected, but here we are pretending that just because someone is a billionaire we can simply ignore his trangressions in the area of free speech.
T
His transgressions are all in your imagination, the guy hasn't even had time to unpack his lunch box yet, RUOK??
If you read the article I posted you will know he's got form.
No, Musk is when criticism of him is concerned.We get it, you are scared of and oppose diversity and inclusivity.
I actually think it makes it easier.No, Musk is when criticism of him is concerned.
Social media should be publicly owned as is is a public resource, having it owned by one person is what you call diverse and inclusive ?
Ha ha ha ha.
Yes he is an engineering genius but that doesn't make him a social libertarian.
I have the feeling he should stick to engineering and leave social media alone. People with egos the size of his could well regard Twitter as his playground to influence discussion the way he wants it to go.
I hate Twitter, it's full of nutcases saying very little of substance, but so far people seem to be able to say what they want, I doubt whether that will last.
The wicked always fear exposure.Seems twitter employees are furiously changing scripts.
Shadow banning of large accounts has changed.
A lot of the bots are disappearing.
Leftist are leaving in droves while the right leaning accounts are gaining followers.
There's a huge drop in attack bots that generally attack right leaning accounts.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?