- Joined
- 14 February 2005
- Posts
- 15,109
- Reactions
- 16,914
Something I've encountered in a very different (non-medical) context is that there's an Australian cultural thing which basically doesn't like planning for "what if?" scenarios.It also appears the successful nations had solid pandemic strategies ready to roll
I've done a fair bit of that at work in the past and I soon realised it was best to not mention what I was doing to anyone not involved or needing to know and especially not mention it in social conversation outside work. People just don't see the point in planning for something that hasn't happened yet, or at least not recently, and doesn't seem to be an immediate threat.
The point of such planning of course is that when the proverbial does hit the fan well then that's not a good time to be planning anything at all. It's far better to be able to get the previous planning out, which has all the details of everything already in it, and just adapt that to the actual situation being faced.
There's a value in knowing that you can do x, and having a list of everything that needs to happen in order to do it, even if it has never been necessary. It's still worth knowing that it's possible, how it can be done, what it would achieve and so on. It's another tool in the box if needed, a tool that's already been thoroughly investigated and about which there's no uncertainty amid the crisis. It's ready to be applied if needed.
Asian culture seems far more amenable to that sort of planning than Western culture.
The other interesting difference between China's initial response and ours was that they immediately ramped up production of every medical requirement to meet Wuhan needs. We ramped up an economic solution for a recessionary economy instead.
If you don't own it and have it in your possession then you don't really control it.
Australia's reliance on others to produce practically everything of a manufactured nature has bitten hard on this one and hopefully the lesson is learned. When push comes to shove in an emergency a contract for someone on the other side of the world to supply something is worthless in practice. In the absence of being a serious military or economic power, which Australia most certainly isn't, it doesn't really work and even then it's risky.
The best option is production locally with the ability to ramp up.
The second best option is a great big stockpile. It's finite but at least it's a big stockpile.
Relying on someone else to supply in a crisis? That's gambling basically.......