I trend trade and am in DD at this time and feel it may continue,
but I take my positions as they come up and follow my system to the letter having faith in it's expectancy.
If you agree with probabilities, expectancy and random outcomes you will get streaks of losing trades and the only thing you can do is control risk and position size forget about tweaking system to try and evade those losing streaks.Gotta trust the system. But being in a DD always makes you wonder what you can be doing better. I like systematic trading since I know my backtests have proven my edge (to some degree).
Gotta trust the system. But being in a DD always makes you wonder what you can be doing better. I like systematic trading since I know my backtests have proven my edge (to some degree).
Hi Newt, I was thinking more along the lines that the market was creating the DD.Sometimes being in a DD larger than expected forces you to confront the possibility you're not correctly trading the system (psychology, or mistakes). It may also give you the kick to try changes in your system (entry, exit, position sizing) BUT you then need to be even more careful than usual following robust coding, backtesting, live testing checks before possibly changing your code.
I've found some very useful improvements in my code and processes after identifying significant underperformance against other trend followers here on ASF, or listening to new ideas from podcasts etc. The vast majority of ideas and tweaks show no reliable/robut benefit, but that makes it even more valuable when/if you find a "nugent in the rough". The journey never ends......
Hi Newt, I was thinking more along the lines that the market was creating the DD.
I totally agree and changing or tweaking system will not fix that problemPerhaps for an experienced trader with a proven long term system the bulk of the DD will be market related, but for most of us the reality is a decent % of the DD will still be self inflicted.
If you agree with probabilities, expectancy and random outcomes you will get streaks of losing trades and the only thing you can do is control risk and position size forget about tweaking system to try and evade those losing streaks.
A great question to ask and one I would be interested in others thoughts,All the above comments also point to another problem.
We all know markets are dynamic and what could be a good system yesterday may be obsolete today
After soso results or DD, when do you decide that a specific algorithm is now passé?
After becoming more popular or due to fashions, market movements, whatever :
Your system is past its time and has lost its edge
For the experienced system traders here: how did you reach that conclusion and close a system?
Ideally, i assume you do not want to ask this question in the heat of a DD or in the middle of a crash?
Interesting topic about admitting defeat.I doubt there is an easy answer.you can underperform vs an index for s while yet still be overall relevant
It will be hard to admit defeat and say system 1 or 2 gone, i need to stop
Back to psyche..as per a SP..it will catch up.. etc
But would like to hear from experience system traders
Not thinking of stopping any system yet
Interesting topic about admitting defeat. In the past 14 years I have dumped 3 systems, systems were "revised" due to poor performance (plus a fault in system risk) so there was hope of better performance. What brought me to stop those systems was the rising fear of continuing that trend with retirement looming plus no point if your not ahead of the index.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?