No way should this guy be permitted entry. Nothing to do with political parties, he was fleeing the country, the Federal Police acted for a reason and one can not expect the Police to reveal all their methods or information as that may simply aid the terrorists...
No way should this guy be permitted entry. Nothing to do with political parties, he was fleeing the country, the Federal Police acted for a reason and one can not expect the Police to reveal all their methods or information as that may simply aid the terrorists...
No way should this guy be permitted entry. Nothing to do with political parties, he was fleeing the country, the Federal Police acted for a reason and one can not expect the Police to reveal all their methods or information as that may simply aid the terrorists...
No way should this guy be permitted entry. Nothing to do with political parties, he was fleeing the country, the Federal Police acted for a reason and one can not expect the Police to reveal all their methods or information as that may simply aid the terrorists...
Rudd wants Haneef inquiry regardless of election result
Posted Wed Nov 21, 2007 5:42pm AEDT
Federal Opposition Leader Kevin Rudd says he will keep pushing for a full judicial inquiry into the treatment of Dr Mohamed Haneef, whether he wins Government or not.
Dr Haneef was charged with supporting a terrorist organisation involved in the failed UK car bombings earlier this year, but the case later collapsed and he returned to India.
Kevin Rudd has outlined his priorities in a speech to the National Press Club today and says even if he does not win the election he still wants an inquiry.
"I don't think any of us on our side of politics know precisely what's gone on there other than that something smells," he said.
"That's why I'm serious, whether we win this election or whether we don't that there should be a full judicial inquiry into that matter so that we can get to the bottom of what went wrong.
"It's quite important because that then informs the future debate about the nature of our laws."
AFP insisted Haneef was no threat
Hedley Thomas | November 03, 2007
TOP federal police officers told the Howard Government on the same day it cancelled Mohamed Haneef's visa that their investigations showed there was nothing to suggest the Gold Coast doctor's involvement in violence or terrorism in Australia.
But Immigration Minister Kevin Andrews insists he relied largely on Australian Federal Police advice to cancel the visa on July 16 after a Brisbane magistrate decided three hours earlier to grant Dr Haneef bail because of exceptional circumstances, including the weakness of the police case.
Mate, I'd hate to be judged by the remote chance of a fact I might have 98% of my DNA in common with SF, let alone if he was a weirdo cousin...PS I's hate to be judged by the fact that I share some DNA with some weirdo second cousin or whatever.
supefly lol
I think you'll find (working from memory) that he tried to phone the fed police BEFORE he left !!
If that is true , your claims would seem to be "off with the pixies".
In any case, he was never a threat (well according to AFP).
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22694422-601,00.html
Key words being " in Australia"... Haneef was never suspected of anything in Australia... but his visa was canned on bad character grounds. By very possible association with the Glasgow suspects, on a chat room with something like " don't worry they don't know anything about you "...then all of a sudden going to the hospital and asking for leave... one way ticket to India...
Try the 4 Corners interview with Haneef... they ask him some hard questions, though not as many as needed. Haneef's big concern is if he is never allowed a visa to Australia, then he would never be able to obtain a visa to other western countries. Is he so concerned about his family "now", but they were not with him before... he said a lot of bad stuff about Australia on his arrival in India, I saw the Indian news myself. This should not be jumped on by the Labour crew as another anti John Howard thing, though it already is, anything goes with the looney left, Rudd and his half wits may have a lot to answer for someday.
, on a chat room with something like " don't worry they don't know anything about you "...then all of a sudden going to the hospital and asking for leave... one way ticket to India...
Try the 4 Corners interview with Haneef... .
LIZ JACKSON: Tony Webster was the British police officer Dr Haneef's aunt had told him to call, to sort out the SIM card issue.
Haneef had stressed to the police at the time of his arrest that he had called Tony Webster’s number three times, before heading for the airport.
These police now knew this was true.
They’d checked Haneef’s phone log, and the UK calls were made at 3:08, 3:29 and 4:32pm, Brisbane time, but the calls were unsuccessful.
MOHAMED HANEEF: I don’t know what, why he was not picking up the phone at all. It was just going blank.
Mate, I'd hate to be judged by the remote chance of a fact I might have 98% of my DNA in common with SF, let alone if he was a weirdo cousin...
You're half on the money there. Lol!..Some fwit?
Rocket launcher suspect linked to terrorism group
Posted Fri Jan 5, 2007 9:48pm
A man charged with supplying stolen Army rocket launchers is suspected of having connections with a group plotting to blow up the Sydney Harbour Bridge and the Lucas Heights nuclear reactor.
http://search.abc.net.au/search/sea...ks=20&collection=abcall&query=rocket+launcherADF officer in court over rocket launcher theft
Posted Thu Apr 5, 2007 5:48pm AEST
Updated Thu Apr 5, 2007 7:08pm AEST
Two men have appeared in a Sydney court to face charges over the theft of eight rocket launchers from a Defence Forces depot in Sydney.
Forty-six-year-old Shane Della Vedova is a captain working in munitions.
He was brought into the dock after his co-accused, 39-year-old Dean Taylor, a former Defence Force member.
Both men bear the clean-cut and fit look of army officers.
The magistrate has been surprised by an application from the Defence Forces for Captain Della Vedova to be released into its custody.
The lawyer for Taylor says the allegations go back to 2002 and the witnesses may be unreliable.
He says the serious charges will be denied
PS I find threads such as this weird.
I mean, did the recent theft of rockets from the military - and onselling to gangsters and/or terrorists right under our noses get any (significant) publicity?
You blokes know what a rocket can do? to the Opera House etc ? These people (including serving Aus military officers) were seriously nasty types - and you say nothing !!?
but you kick up a stink because Haneef's old SIM card was "counties away" from a bomb scene in UK?
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/01/05/1822271.htm
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/04/05/1891227.htm
http://search.abc.net.au/search/sea...ks=20&collection=abcall&query=rocket+launcher
I agree, such narrow minded (by implication subjects) should be culled out as they invariably end in bitter argument and stalemate. The slur intended on a person that has not had the opportunity to defend himself before a proper and fair tribunal is bad to say the least.
some halfwit?You're half on the money there. Lol!..
I'd beg to differ. I think he has been proven to be innocent, and others including Keelty, to be morons and or massively incompetent.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?