This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Does Reincarnation Exist? :)

Does Reincarnation Exist


  • Total voters
    50
Some of the Army experiences are in there, but it's fiction really. A travel book with the main character travelling around the world seeing these amazing things and meeting all these incredible people with specific insights into how the world works. The characters are based on historical figures like JC, Muhummad, The Buddha, Dr Who, Rafa, Wayne, etc. Topics like those discussed in this forum will all be attacked. Will have to add in a Snake and a Nelly now.....

Thorton uses his 100K to buy things that wil move on the day without any regard to the actual volume of trade. He did try to adjust to make it fair, but I'm not sure how much he adjusted. Bloody amazing effort though!
 
It sounds interesting.......have you read a lot about any one subject, or is it more from a personal perspective?
Will we get a cut...? :topic :
 
It solves all the worlds problems of course!

Including if reincarnation actually exists. (back on topic)

It's pretty average really. Almost unreadable.
 
kennas said:
It solves all the worlds problems of course!

Including if reincarnation actually exists. (back on topic)

It's pretty average really. Almost unreadable.
I find it surprising that you would think your writings to be un-readable.I also find it surprising that some one as intelligent and articulate as yourself would have such a 'clinical' opinion on the subject of soul-no soul/ faith-beliefs.
I think the subject quite confronting and that listening to others is stimulating, especially when their opinions/beliefs differ so greatly from my own.[i'm sure you are the same]
So thanks for the in-put..
If your book gets published, and I have no doubt you have the courage to do that, I hope it all goes well. I personally would like to do a childrens book someday.
 


I knew there is more to you that your ravings on the virtues of logic
I am not really that anti-logic, i am an engineer by profession and love science and maths...!

anyway, its great to hear you are writing a book... AWESOME, i look forward to reading it when it comes out.... or for that matter, even before its published...
 
Rafa said:
...WayneL point of view (even tho he doesn't believe in a God)

Whoa there Saphire! I never said that. I just don't buy religions image of God.

Cheers
 
ducati916 said:
PROSELYTIZATION

But a classic nonetheless.

jog on
d998

Thank you, I am a stickler for spelling, but often fall well short of my own standards.

Peace
 
wayneL said:
Whoa there Saphire! I never said that. I just don't buy religions image of God.

Cheers
Whoops.... Sorry for the misinterpretation... Regardless, still agree with your point of view....
 
wayneL said:
Whoa there Saphire! I never said that. I just don't buy religions image of God.

Cheers
Mornin' Wayne..
.....'religions.'.... Anyone in particular or all of them? I used to think [when it didn't hurt so much] that MY God was one that existed by my set of rules.......I consider myself not so naive now......[someone is going to comment on the 'naive']...
I'd be interested to hear your opinion
Cheers...
 
With respect kennas, I think this misrepresents Paul Davies' work and I'm sure that his work is not the basis of "ID". This link is to Davies' address on receiving the Templeton Prize, which I think is the one you're talking about (?) http://www.firstthings.com/ftissues/ft9508/davies.html
You can see from this that Davies' idea about purposive design in the universe is a long way from any kind of creationism, even though he's sometimes cited as a scientist who supports Intelligent Design. I don't know whether he's done any statistical work on the probability of earth's existence, but I'm pretty confident that if he did it was not the reason he was awarded this prize.

Here's a couple of paragraphs from that address.


Ghoti
 

In all religions where God is named/defined, God is personified with human charactaristics... jealosy, anger, revenge, racism, need to be worshipped, etc.

I don't buy it. I have my own ideas of course, but am humble enough to realise that it is my own construction from my imagination.

I contend that any human ideas about God can only be a construction. Hence the very foundation of religious dogma could be entirely wrong.
 
Wayne, I agree with you in regard to the construction of the idea of 'God' here. I am sure no two people on the planet could describe God in the same way. This is one of the Mystics approach to God: It is a totally individual experience.
 
mornin' Wayne..
Theoretically.......if you believe in God as the Creator...wouldn't it be possible that he give you like character traits. And a handbook?
...theoretically of course....
Cheers
 
Ghotib,

Yes, sorry, my comments are a bit haphazzard there.

The numbers are not from Davies work, I read that somewhere else, possibly a Personal Investor magazine ......didn't mean to link them here.

I also didn't mean to say that it was Davies that started the theory of ID, that goes back pre Socrates. Aristotle, kept the ball rolling with his idea of an 'unmoved mover' who was the 'first cause' of everything. With our current understanding of the world, eveything needs an original source. Things can't possibly exist forever? So, the conclusion is that there is something we do not understand yet. All we know is that it has existed forever. Unless we start making stuff out of nothing.....

I'm not exatly sure which book contained the ideas Davies was presented his award for. What I remember is that he's a Physicist and was presented an award for his work to religion by his conclusions that it's scientifically impossible for the universe to be an accident. I haven't read the one you quoted from. I have only read his 'God and the New Physics' which I gave to a friend a while ago and can't quote from here. I need to study up a bit more on his work obviously.....

So, what was the 'first cause'? Or, did it all start from nothing? Impossible.
 
kennas said:
Wayne, I agree with you in regard to the construction of the idea of 'God' here. I am sure no two people on the planet could describe God in the same way. This is one of the Mystics approach to God: It is a totally individual experience.
Morning Kennas,
A comment on the individual experience.....the first thing a christian comes to understand is that it is basically all about the personal experience, whether that is termed mystical,fantastical..........the most pragmatic,grounded in the real world people have surprised me in regards to their faith.
Cheers
 
Hey Nelly,

If it's personal experience why have organised religion??
 
kennas said:
Hey Nelly,

If it's personal experience why have organised religion??
Kennas I can't and wouldn't presume to answer for anyone else on this one, but IMO it is not about 'organised'... more like..like minded[in faith] people supporting each other, even the most devout have problems with faith, [usually to do with focus] living in the world today who wouldn't? I do not agree with a lot of things people have done and will continue to do in the name of their faith, but that is driven by man not from anything in the Bible..[I only have a rudimentary knowledge of the Bible atm regards to quotes]
I used to have the mindset that ALL the different faiths were a load of ####
because of what I perceived them to be all about, you know...you just have to look at history. And they could never answer a straight question..fantastical..yes.
There is nothing in the Bible that says any of it was 'the way'...man has twisted and bent the Word to his own means, to satisfy what ever...greed, ego...
I couldn't even begin to presume I could have a theological discussion with [much as I would like to think I could ] anyone, but I could refer you to a site www.godswordforyou.com the author is a Rosemary Bardsley she speaks plainly and simply and answered a lot of my questions.
Another good one is a book by Morison Frank a person who set out to dis-prove the Bible and came to believe himself it's titled "Who moved the stone"
The one thing I can say is to keep it simple and don't get caught up in the 'slants' that man puts on Gospel.
I suppose the trick is to read it.
Good to hear your views...Thanks
 
...the kidz r driving me NUTZ ........where's that masking tape. .......................I'll b lookin forward to reading everyones comments.......later
Cheers
 
nelly said:
The one thing I can say is to keep it simple and don't get caught up in the 'slants' that man puts on Gospel.
I suppose the trick is to read it.


Well said Nelly,

I think its important to read it for yourself...
In particular... I would suggest reading the first 4 books of the New Testament, commonly called the GOSPELS.... This is as close an account as you can get about Jesus' life and teachings and is what true Christianity 'should be' based on! There is no mention of revenge, of violence, of warmongering.... rather how to live your life, in union with GOD and your NEIGHBOUR...

IMHO you should forget about the rest of the Bible as that is more the history of Israel and Judaism (Old Testament) and then further writings by followers of Jesus later on... (rest of the New Testament)... and are what I would considers MAN's twist on Gods Word!

For those who don't beleive in GOD, read the GOSPELS, but ignore the GOD references.... what do you have left... Do unto others as you would like others do unto you....

AMAZING.... who would have thought of that!!!
 
For those who don't beleive in GOD, read the GOSPELS, but ignore the GOD references.... what do you have left... Do unto others as you would like others do unto you....

I think all atheists could learn something from it.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...