- Joined
- 16 June 2005
- Posts
- 4,281
- Reactions
- 6
More nasty vexatious rumour the Coalition had the opportunity to prosecute the case after talking and dealing with low life's under privilege and failed to do so, so badly Bishop is now in hiding.
More nasty vexatious rumour the Coalition had the opportunity to prosecute the case after talking and dealing with low life's under privilege and failed to do so, so badly Bishop is now in hiding.
What you need to accept is that when it comes to poor judgement, Julia Gillard has a very, very long history.More nasty vexatious rumour the Coalition had the opportunity to prosecute the case after talking and dealing with low life's under privilege and failed to do so, so badly Bishop is now in hiding.
What you need to accept is that when it comes to poor judgement, Julia Gillard has a very, very long history.
Just look at a couple of her judgements as PM. Standing behind Craig Thompson and supporting Peter Slipper as speaker to the end. It is her judgements, both past and present that will ultimately be her undoing. It's only a question of time.
The sad truth for Labor is that it will be the Labor Party itself that pays the highest political price.
The only person who ran a slush fund and lied about it was and is Abbott......from which he arranged for Hanson to be jailed on a technicality what a dog.
Last night Ms Gillard hosted about 25 female bloggers and web writers - whose sites reach about 2.5 million people - at Kirribilli House, as she gears up to use gender issues to maximum advantage in the coming election year.
Labor strategists increasingly see gender working for Ms Gillard and against Mr Abbott, especially since the PM's ''misogyny'' speech in October, which received international coverage.
I think Julia is on a winner here. I hope she continues to divide the nation by gender. You go for it, girl.
Last night Ms Gillard hosted about 25 female bloggers and web writers - whose sites reach about 2.5 million people - at Kirribilli House, as she gears up to use gender issues to maximum advantage in the coming election year.
Last night Ms Gillard hosted about 25 female bloggers and web writers - whose sites reach about 2.5 million people - at Kirribilli House, as she gears up to use gender issues to maximum advantage in the coming election year.
Labor strategists increasingly see gender working for Ms Gillard and against Mr Abbott, especially since the PM's ''misogyny'' speech in October, which received international coverage.
I think Julia is on a winner here. I hope she continues to divide the nation by gender. You go for it, girl.
Is Gillard a good role model for Australian women?
yes - 15,638
NO - 47,005
How utterly bizarreI can honestly say when I choose to read a blog the gender of the writer never even crosses my mind. She really does inhabit a different universe to most people
Ninemsn poll doesn't agree that gender is working for Ms Gillard - in fact I think decent women are embarrased by her stupid name calling. Most unbecoming for any PM, let alone a female.
That's around 75% say NO and, especially as a female, I agree with them.
http://ninemsn.com.au
About time. She will now be experiencing for herself the effect of the direct campaign against her via the AWU matter so successfully hammered in the last week of parliament by Julie Bishop.Well, I guess Julia Gillard can fool half the people some of the time , some the peolpe half the time but not all the people all the time.
Her chickens are now coming home to roost.
Agree. But there will still be some women, mostly younger, who are impressed by her rantings.Ninemsn poll doesn't agree that gender is working for Ms Gillard - in fact I think decent women are embarrased by her stupid name calling. Most unbecoming for any PM, let alone a female.
What a grisly array.God help us.:shake:
View attachment 49912
http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/polit...was-scorcher-says-gillard-20121210-2b5q5.html
Urggh! There is quite a few there I would cross the road to avoid
Shame they never include people like Dame Elisabeth Murdoch on such lists (recently passed away sadly). I believe she was very influential to a lot of people in a quiet non-nonsense kind of way.
Agree. She was a great example to some of the arch feminists on that list.Urggh! There is quite a few there I would cross the road to avoid
Shame they never include people like Dame Elisabeth Murdoch on such lists (recently passed away sadly). I believe she was very influential to a lot of people in a quiet non-nonsense kind of way.
What a grisly array.God help us.:shake:
View attachment 49912
http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/polit...was-scorcher-says-gillard-20121210-2b5q5.html
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?