- Joined
- 14 February 2005
- Posts
- 15,340
- Reactions
- 17,657
Airlines scrap perfectly serviceable planes simply because they are too costly to operate compared to new ones.Don't know if it has already been asked in this thread or not (I haven't read it in full), but would the installation of solar panels add value to the home?
I would say yes, for the same reason that for a potential buyer, a house with solar hot water would probably sell easier than one with an old off-peak electric clunker. The way I see it, the more that the installation of solar panels becomes 'normal,' the more that people buying houses would demand it, since the initial outlay has already been made.
I've had differing opinions to this question in other places.
The 1100W figure I quoted is the inverter limit and is a "hard" limit set by software in the inverter. Actual panels connected at present total 1360W.Is that the rated peak AC output of the inverter and, if so, does it go above it.
The reason I ask is that mine is rated max AC output of either 1600W or 1650W, I'm not absolutely sure, but I have seen it go slightly above that (1655 to 1660 on a number of occasions), and on a couple of occasions, up to 1700W but only for about 2 to 3 seconds. This has been in sunny conditions when there is also reflectivity from cloud near the sun. During these conditions, the output can be quiet variable due to cloud movement.
I underatstand the cool panels + direct sunlight + reflected light aspect of panel output.The 1100W figure I quoted is the inverter limit and is a "hard" limit set by software in the inverter. Actual panels connected at present total 1360W.
In terms of what you are seeing, it is commonly known as "edge effect" and is a consequence of reflected light etc, noting that after a period of cloud cover the panels will be cool. Then the sun appears and cool panels + direct sunlight + reflected light = output above nominal rating.
How much an installed clean energy system is worth to the buyer may differ, depending on circumstances. There is a clause in the residential FIT scheme that concerns the transfer to a new owner:Don't know if it has already been asked in this thread or not (I haven't read it in full), but would the installation of solar panels add value to the home?
I would say yes, for the same reason that for a potential buyer, a house with solar hot water would probably sell easier than one with an old off-peak electric clunker. The way I see it, the more that the installation of solar panels becomes 'normal,' the more that people buying houses would demand it, since the initial outlay has already been made.
I've had differing opinions to this question in other places.
see http://www.energy.wa.gov.au/2/3654/64/residential_.pm for details. But generally, it will affect the price you can ask for your home.*If the property with the renewable energy system is sold or leased within the 10-year period, payments will transfer to the new owners or tenants if they are eligible.
Your spot on todster, its a bit nauseas at work, where everyone is going on about mine is bigger than yours and I produced x more KW than you.
Most of the solar installations are in affluent areas, poor areas can't afford them. Which is a shame because they could do with them the most.
Oh well, the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, as usual. It is a strange world we live in.
I think you're probably referring to the rating of the panels themselves?I underatstand the cool panels + direct sunlight + reflected light aspect of panel output.
I take it then you have never seen output go above the "hard" limit. I have (assuming it's the same as the max AC power rating), but only slightly.
Hey sp it's a great change from the investment property talk at the workplace.
You think so
At least with investment properties you could have a laugh at the horror stories.
With this solar stuff it won't become a drama untill the feed in tarrifs cut out.
Then smart meters that have been installed can really be exploited and everyone will be screaming, give me back the inductive disk meter.
And guess what todster, they payed to get their own meter upgraded.LOL
What am I saying, I was one of them OMG
Time of day charging. please noooo
I stayed on A1.
About 5 months after the smart meter install, I calculated the cost of the variable tariff structure against against total usage at the A1 rate and found that if I had switched to smart power, the cost of the electricity I used from the grid would have been about 9% higher.
Crunching the numbers again from September 25 to today (mostly summer period), the cost difference is 17% in favour of smart power. Overall though (since early April), it's still about 4% in favour of A1.
It will be interesting to see after 12 months and a full contribution from both the summer and winter smart power rates.
http://www.synergy.net.au/at_home/smartpower.xhtml
I'm not on smart power, but the individual smart power tariffs are accessable on the meter for direct comparison with the A1 flat tariff and vice-versa.
http://www.synergy.net.au/at_home/how_can_i_read_my_meter.xhtml
Channels 10, 20, 30 and 40 are the individual smart power tariffs.
Channel 07 (total KW hours) is what is read for A1. On mine, this is also the default display.
My meter is the button type. There's a seperate button to read the amount fed into the grid from the solar panels (channel 107).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?