Wysiwyg
Everyone wants money
- Joined
- 8 August 2006
- Posts
- 8,428
- Reactions
- 284
It definitely looks like Dominos has stolen your technology, tried to b.s. their way around it and then tried to silence you. Man that is so so wrong.
Last Friday, the NSW Supreme Court lifted the injunction that Domino's had obtained to prevent film maker Phoebe Stuart-Carberry from publishing her documentary.
Everyone can now see her documentary at ExposeDominos.com
On Saturday morning, Channel 7's Weekend Sunrise interviewed Phoebe as well as the directors of Precision Tracking (of which I am one). We chatted with host Sally Bowrey about our battle with Domino's.
Disclosure: I am the R&D Manager at Precision Tracking Pty. Ltd and am also a director of the company. My company is involved in a patent dispute with Domino's over GPS tracking technology. I was one of the people interviewed for this documentary video.
One thing I do believe is that there is probably little reason for a small company like Precision Tracking to take on DMP for fun... so chances are you truely believe (and indeed, may have been) wronged by them. I do wish you a just and proper outcome (whatever that may be).
Unfortunately it doesn't look like it has generated the media hype that you are hoping for?
One thing I do believe is that there is probably little reason for a small company like Precision Tracking to take on DMP for fun... so chances are you truely believe (and indeed, may have been) wronged by them. I do wish you a just and proper outcome (whatever that may be).
They already got the hype though, articles in news.com.au, AFR, smartcompany, even interview on TV!
My is that the likely story is that Dominos probably acted in bad faith but unlikely they acted illegally. Companies do this stuff to tech contractors all the time - I can recall multiple instances of almost identical scenarios from my personal experience and some very large global companies (much much larger than DMP) have a reputation for doing this - it is a lesson most startups end up having to learn the hard way unfortunately.
If I was the CEO of this company, I'd take my hard lumps and move the company on ASAP, all of this effort and capital which are very precious in a small company could easily be better spent on more productive endeavours. I have been under a CEO who ended up with this sort of myopic focus and from that experience I doubt much good will come for the employees.
Unfortunately it doesn't look like it has generated the media hype that you are hoping for? The youtube link above had only 158 views when I accessed it. Is there another place where it is hosted? The doco was the effort of one person on a shoestring budget and short timeframe, so perhaps it lacked the elements (e.g. background music, deep conspiracy-sounding narrator etc) that would engage the general public. May be the next step is to crowdsource some ideas on how to fight the battle?
From a neutral witness perspective... the doco provided more details on the nature of the dispute, but it doesn't contain anything concrete enough to persuade me one way or another.
One thing I do believe is that there is probably little reason for a small company like Precision Tracking to take on DMP for fun... so chances are you truely believe (and indeed, may have been) wronged by them. I do wish you a just and proper outcome (whatever that may be).
'Domino's Pizza has hit a roadblock in its bitter dispute with IT firm Precision Tracking over the intellectual property in its GPS Driver Tracker technology, after the patent office refused to allow the retailer to grill executives from its former partner.'
'However, in a ruling yesterday, the Australian Patent Office refused Domino's request to summon witnesses from Precision Tracking to a patent hearing to be grilled on their application.
Domino's had asked for Precision executives Alexander Green, Vlad Lasky and Nathan Parrott to front up for examination and for the firm to produce emails and documents confirming the validity of their claims.
But deputy patent commissioner Phil Spann said he had no reason to believe the requested emails and documents would have a substantial impact on the proceedings.
He similarly said Domino's did not have a general right to cross-examine individuals, but would reconsider summonsing witnesses should Domino's prepare a list of specific questions it wanted asked - and should he consider them to be highly significant in detemining a resolution to the dispute.
"[The summonsing of witnesses] is not to be invoked by one party as a general means of exploring the other party’s case and particularly is not to be used in a fishing expedition or a hunt for a ‘smoking gun’," Spann said.
"Usually it will be necessary to identify a real and specific factual issue in dispute, not merely speculation that production or summons might reveal such a matter."
He said Domino's approach was "unusual" in that it appeared to be arguing that Precision's statements should be considered incorrect until documents were produced to substantiate them.
"For example, [Domino's] seeks unspecified documents recording the brainstorming of the inventive concept by Precision before the meeting in November 2012 which it says should exist if Precision’s claims are valid," Spann said.
"Domino’s therefore appears to be making the request on the assumption that the documents do not exist."
The pizza chain now has just 14 days to file any further information to avoid the patent being awarded.'
And another 13%+ this period.... Wow. It's not like they are increasing their prices either? It seems to be all productivity / volume gains...
It's staggering really. The technology must be fantastic to squeeze so much productivity out of small pizza shops. The SSS growth is becoming more rapid rather than slowing down too.10.9% group wide, 14.8% in ANZ. Amazing result. They've increased their SSS growth in ANZ over last year.
NPAT up 43.6%.
I still hate the pizzas.
10.9% group wide, 14.8% in ANZ. Amazing result. They've increased their SSS growth in ANZ over last year.
NPAT up 43.6%.
I still hate the pizzas.
Is it just me or is the FCF ~$20m a bit low for a $6.5B company? Operating cashflow is $128.5m while capex was $132m. The FCF of $20 is pretty from sale proceeds of PP&E.
They spent a lot of capex... I am guessing a lot of that is store conversions of acquired store? I haven't the time to look at how much they spent on other stuff like IT, oven or robots. But while profit growth of 44% is high, it's really <$30m in absolute terms.
What is the effective life of these capex investments? What does a steady state picture actually look like? I am guessing we won't know for some time as they just upped there store rollout target.
Also... is there a cap on SSS? How many more ovens/chef can physically fit in a store?
I need a bit more time to look thru this... but DMP's been a crowded trade for some time. I wonder if there's something in the results to change that.
Honestly, 80x earnings would probably be pretty steep if they owned the Domino's brand.At ~80x earnings there is zero room to disappoint.
Has anyone else notice that there seems to be a lot of Domino's discount offers of late in their email?
Not particularly in my email, but check how many active coupons they have:
https://www.ozbargain.com.au/deals/dominos.com.au
And some of those are really good deals.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.