CanOz
Home runs feel good, but base hits pay bills!
- Joined
- 11 July 2006
- Posts
- 11,543
- Reactions
- 519
Agree.Good idea. Should be something in this for everyone.
I think it should be a long-only system that is atleast EOD if not longer as its easier to trade. I also think that it should trade a portfolio because it'll be tough for many people to trade a public system on a single instrument.
I'd also like to see it leveraged, but that's just my preference.
According to academics, the success rate of system trading is far greater than discretionary trading.
First find a system, back-test it, if it not accurate, amend again, back-test it again until it becomes a profitable system.
I use system trading model when I look at copper and zinc, and it works most of the time.
FWIW& i'd like to see a swing system,
Brend,According to academics, the success rate of system trading is far greater than discretionary trading.
First find a system, back-test it, if it not accurate, amend again, back-test it again until it becomes a profitable system.
I use system trading model when I look at copper and zinc, and it works most of the time.
FWIW
I think swing systems are better when able to monitor intra day... or at least have a broker with buy stops, so you can stop into signals when not monitoring.
In fact, I like to think of swing trading as trend trading on lower time frame bars. ie trend trading 15m 30m or 1hr bars and this is how I approach it. I do however reference to the daily patten first, then drop down the time frame.
Well i'm easy on this, whatever is easiest to trade EOD really. As stated many including myself haven't the time, or the reliable connectivity to watch intraday.
Cheers,
Can you please back that assertion up with verifiable figures?From my experience
The EOD trader will always beat the Intra-day trader each and every Financial year
Can you please back that assertion up with verifiable figures?
Because with the range of mitigating factors, I don't think anyone can say that with absolute certainty.
Brend,
There has been confusion before as to what "discretionary" trading is.
For instance there may be a trader who has a definite rule based method, but will use discretion on which entry signals to take based on extraneous factors. (While NEVER using discretion on exits). The extraneous factors could range from gut feel, fundamentals, BB sentiment, visual filter etc.
This is opposed to traders who enter and exit on a pure discretion.
What are your academics refering to particularly in this regard?
I feel I can because I have tried both styles of tacking over more than 3 decades
Maybe you should put it to a poll and judge for yourself how futile it is to be an Intra-day adventurer over the only time frame that is important
ie One financial year
Salute and Gods speed
Personally, I find an edge intraday, but readily recognize that others may not. There are a few factors which are pertinent whether one does or doesn't.
I think Nick has answered the question sufficiently to put this argument to rest.
Personally, I find an edge intraday, but readily recognize that others may not. There are a few factors which are pertinent whether one does or doesn't.
I think Nick has answered the question sufficiently to put this argument to rest.
A robust short term system trading Australian stocks should be able to trade the same in UK and US stocks. Just follow around the world.
If Anything he has thrown it into complete Chaos suggesting that ONE can or should trade 3 -4 markets at any one time 24 hours a day
This is Madness and Lunacy if you ask me?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?