This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Defending Brett Kavanaugh

Dear Senator Feinstein;

I am writing with information relevant in evaluating the current nominee to the Supreme Court. As a constituent, I expect that you will maintain this as confidential until we have further opportunity to speak. Brett Kavanaugh physically and sexually assaulted me during high school in the early 1980’s. He conducted these acts with the assistance of REDACTED.

Both were one to two years older than me and students at a local private school.

The assault occurred in a suburban Maryland area home at a gathering that included me and four others. Kavanaugh physically pushed me into a bedroom as I was headed for a bathroom up a short stair well from the living room. They locked the door and played loud music precluding any successful attempt to yell for help. Kavanaugh was on top of me while laughing with REDACTED, who periodically jumped onto Kavanaugh. They both laughed as Kavanaugh tried to disrobe me in their highly inebriated state. With Kavanaugh’s hand over my mouth I feared he may inadvertently kill me.

From across the room a very drunken REDACTED said mixed words to Kavanaugh ranging from “go for it” to “stop.” At one point when REDACTED jumped onto the bed the weight on me was substantial. The pile toppled, and the two scrapped with each other. After a few attempts to get away, I was able to take this opportune moment to get up and run across to a hallway bathroom. I locked the bathroom door behind me. Both loudly stumbled down the stair well at which point other persons at the house were talking with them. I exited the bathroom, ran outside of the house and went home.

I have not knowingly seen Kavanaugh since the assault. I did see REDACTED once at the REDACTED where he was extremely uncomfortable seeing me.

I have received medical treatment regarding the assault. On July 6 I notified my local government representative to ask them how to proceed with sharing this information . It is upsetting to discuss sexual assault and its repercussions, yet I felt guilty and compelled as a citizen about the idea of not saying anything.

I am available to speak further should you wish to discuss. I am currently REDACTED and will be in REDACTED.

In confidence, REDACTED.
 
He could be telling the truth about being a virgin, getting drunk and letting the old feller out seems to me to indicate he had no clue when it comes to women.
I have no doubt it happened an awful lot in the past. There was a lot of this culture going on.

But we can't even place him at the scene of the crime (because she doesn't know where) and zero confirmation from supposed eyewitness accounts. In fact the witnesses have said they don’t remember it happening, or it didn't happen. Thats in both cases.

So where too from there?
More testimonials from democrats supporters?
They seem to be coming out of the woodwork and shot down by the supposed "eyewitnesses".

It's down too he said- she said.
 
Yea, we knew that, that was the accusation. That's why he is not accused of rape.
And in his defence he was a minor, pissed and it was a long time ago.
I think it shocked him though as he never did anything like it again. 2 guys against 1 girl though, you can see why she holds a grudge.
He desperately needed a girlfriend. He did get a girlfriend soon after.

The latter thing he allegedly did at the party exposing himself to a drunk girl just shows he was a bit of a dick when drunk. Not really assault. And she was so drunk she might have pinned the wrong guy anyway.

Finally met his wife when they both worked for George Bush in 2001 when he was 35 and no sign of straying since.
 
Last edited:

I'm sure she knows where.

And what "culture" was frequent? Rape? That makes it alright does it? Boys will be boys?

Come on man.
 
I'm sure she knows where.

And what "culture" was frequent? Rape? That makes it alright does it? Boys will be boys?

Come on man.
Are you saying it happened.
I've had a few mates falsely accused and after a hell of a lot proved themselves innocent. One managed to get her charged.

Accusations are proof of nothing.
I didn't endorse rape or said it was "alright to rape".
I acknowledged that it did happen a lot.

Being a lefty I know its natural for you to accuse first though.
 
Both sides of witnesses said it didn't happen. Or is that possibility too far out there.
 

I didn't accused him. A couple of women did.

Will the FBI take a looksy? According to Trump and the GOP, "it's not what they (the FBI) do".

So I guess it's he said, she said.

And oh, there's Brett's diary he kept since he was 15. It showed that he did not attend whatever party "that woman" claimed she was forced into a room by two guys who planned to rape her.

Shouldn't he be down at the station being questioned by detectives instead of going on TV with his wife proclaiming his virtues and innocence?

I thought the legal system have procedure handling these kind of allegations. Where if you're accused of rape they call you in, ask a few questions then book a court date to let the judge sort it out. No? Two tiered justice?


Yea, I know there are women who falsely accused others of rape and sexual assault. That doesn't mean it's all false or not worth looking into.

And you definitely do not ignore it when the woman is accusing a guy with very, very powerful friends. Doing it so publicly like this.
 
Both sides of witnesses said it didn't happen. Or is that possibility too far out there.
The first one or the second one. I reckon the first one did. The second one, probably not.
 
Statue of limitations I think?
It happened to long ago to press charges(I think thats it anyway). They got cosby on a 2002 or 2004 thing.
Also, she needs to go in and give a statement to press charges.

You believe all sides till the evidence reveals it in a better light. Not force "#metoo" onto it and discard evidence for whatever side you pick.
 
The first one or the second one. I reckon the first one did. The second one, probably not.
Sorry that wasn't clear...
Is the possibility that it didn't actually happen not a probability?
 
It's a possibility but unlikely.
Christine Ford is a professor at Stanford University. She has a lot to lose. She advised a Congressman in June and asked to keep it secret. As per usual it came out (like what happened in WA).
It was known in 2012 when she told her therapist. Her career is now stuffed. On balance I think it's true.
 

There's a statue of limitation on sexual assault/rape?

Maybe Kevo, Thomas and Trump can start an inversed "#metoo" tag.
 

This sounds pretty compelling. This isn't some wannabe Starlet trying to gain publicity. But I'm guessing the Congressman was a Dem, which clouded it a bit.
P.S. it's ''''statute of limitations", not "statue". But I know you guys know that
 
This sounds pretty compelling. This isn't some wannabe Starlet trying to gain publicity. But I'm guessing the Congressman was a Dem, which clouded it a bit.
P.S. it's ''''statute of limitations", not "statue". But I know you guys know that
Yea it was a Dem, she betrayed her. Such is politics.
 
I don't believe there is any question of Brett Kavanaugh being tried for any alleged offence. The questions is whether this incident shows a person who shouldn't be a Supreme Court judge on character grounds.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...