- Joined
- 18 June 2010
- Posts
- 277
- Reactions
- 0
you both keep harping on about NAKED OTM PUTS.
Have you any idea what Daniel is teaching?
While Daniel mentions PUTS in passing, he mainly teaches trading with COVERED DEEP-IN-THE-MONEY CALLS.
this is just pure gold....
Total losses? The worst outcome is "break even" when the Guaranteed Stop Loss Order is applied correctly.
Proof Alvin, proof.
Talk is cheap Alvin.
gg
Ultimatum time....put up or shut up.
I say we shut the thread down if Alvin can't post an equity curve, verify the account with Admin.
CanOz
ftw129, you really want me to post my results on a monthly basis? If I did, nobody here would believe it anyway, but I may post next week what I made in February.
For anyone perusing this thread wondering about Daniel's course i would be sceptical as to why they wont provide trading records to one of the mods here, or even post a series of live trades publicly. In fact i dont think Alvin has posted in any other thread, so obviously he doesnt beleive in contributing widely to the ASF community.
If it really is so easy, why is Daniel even selling the course and why is Alvin here defending it? Surely, with compounding, Daniel has made 10's of millions of dollars by now
There is not one example throughout all of history where increased financial reward did not come with increased risk. If as Alvin claims he is making hundreds of thousand of dollars risk free, this is not only impossible, but he has effectively broken every financial theory and rule in the book, it would be like proving gravity doesnt exist.
wayneL, you seem to really want to put people in little pigeon holes. Make sure you at least get your grammar right. It is "unconsciously incompetent" etc. etc. And I don't actually care what people call me or how they classify me, as long as I make good profits every month. And I mean EVERY month.
Total losses? The worst outcome is "break even" when the Guaranteed Stop Loss Order is applied correctly.
How will I cope when the market chomps down on my arm? That has happened twice so far, in August and October 2011, and I am sure it will happen again at some point in the future. What happened then is that I was stopped out of some but not all trades at "break even" and although the monthly profit was lower than usual, there was still a profit at the end of the month.
There is not one example throughout all of history where increased financial reward did not come with increased risk. If as Alvin claims he is making hundreds of thousand of dollars risk free, this is not only impossible, but he has effectively broken every financial theory and rule in the book, it would be like proving gravity doesnt exist.
I'd point out that Alvin didn't actually say he is making the money risk free. You kind of put those words in his mouth.
My 2c, Alvin claimed he has been in the PP stuff since 2009. If so, it's totally possible that he has experienced great returns without a major drawdown from selling volatility in stocks. Plenty of funds which are short vol in stocks have achieved this kind of return, exhibit A would be the PIMCO stocksPLUS series.
Obviously selling VXX would be similar. 30% PA returns have definitely been feasible since 2009.
'cos it seems like a few here are disputing it's possible. I just wanted to point out that it's totally within the realm of returns for selling volatility.
Anyone reading this as a defense of PP or Daniel K is wrong, I still think it's a scam.
Sinner, Alvin is claiming by implication that he has never had a losing month.
There is nothing wrong with trading naked puts or their synthetics, it is a valid strategy fully capable of making a profit long term.
But the suggestion here is that you just put the trades on and collect the cash as expiry. Your graphs show that not to be the case, even if long term profitable.
The thing is though, there is plenty of academic research that says the same thing, "consistent sellers of index vols can generate strong RaR". If you look at the PUT and BXM indexes, that is precisely what they do, systematic vol selling, collect the cash on expiry.
I think it is possible, with the exception of 2011, to have been selling vol since 2009 without a losing month.
:badsmile: devils advocate end.
Obviously it's a logical fallacy along the lines of recency bias to believe this can continue indefinitely. Arc Sine Law and all that.
that one should mitigate.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?