I said that I was making money with the knowledge I gained from Daniel's course, which cost me $3,200 and has been returned to me more than one hundred fold.
Care to actually prove this statement? Any mod will be more than happy to verify your broker statements
What is there to grasp?
I said that I was making money with the knowledge I gained from Daniel's course, which cost me $3,200 and has been returned to me more than one hundred fold. And now that I have read all the books you recommended and gained a better understanding of options trading, I make even more money.
WTF is wrong with that?
Four years ago I didn't even know what options were. It happened to be Daniel Kertcher (but it could have been any of the other stock market educators) who got me interested in options trading. I doubt very much that simply reading a few books would have put me on the path to successful trading. The main benefit of the three day live course is that you can ask questions along the way. You cannot ask questions from a book. As I said, the course cost of $3,200 has been returned to me more than one hundred fold and the $150 cost of the books was also a good investment as it has increased my profitability.
Reading only the books without the guidance of a live mentor would not nearly have been as successful.
Hmmmm...How many mentors do you need Al? I seem to remember you also spruked the Louise Bedford $15,000.00 course.
Ah ... and there's the rub Alvin.
http://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/There's+the+rub
I've supplied the link to the meaning of the idiom for you Alvin. I know that they can be a challenge for you to understand. Should I have included a definition of "idiom" for you too?
Care to actually prove this statement? Any mod will be more than happy to verify your broker statements
nulla nulla (btw what an apt name), would you care to show me on this forum or anywhere else where I spruiked any of Louise Bedford's courses? Get your facts straight before you make these wild accusations.
Prawn_86, care to check my earlier posts?
I have shown some of my broker's statements on this forum, only to be told that nobody believed them.
I have gone through some of my trades from start to finish and when they turned out to be successful I was told this was a "one-off fluke".
So, I have been there, done that.
...
At what point, in Alvins's parallel universe, is a loss possible?
Tell me something I didn't know.
Unfortunately I may need the assistance of a ouija board in order to do so, as those traders are unlikely to still be with us.
For those of you who keep saying that Daniel should run a Fund for people who don't want to trade themselves if his recommendations are as good as he says. Well, I have news for you. Daniel has done exactly that. He started that Fund six months ago, has received subscriptions of more than $22 million and his returns in those six months are roughly double what you can get from other Mutual Funds in Australia. No, he doesn't show his broker statements but his results are audited by ASIC which is good enough for me. I know that some of you don't think much of ASIC, but I'm afraid that ASIC is the best this government can offer to protect its citizens. I am fully aware that ASIC is underfunded but they are doing the best they can with limited resources. They do, however, audit all Funds that hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL), so at least we are comparing apples with apples.
Whats the name of that fund and where are its results?
For those of you who keep saying that Daniel should run a Fund for people who don't want to trade themselves if his recommendations are as good as he says. Well, I have news for you. Daniel has done exactly that. He started that Fund six months ago, has received subscriptions of more than $22 million and his returns in those six months are roughly double what you can get from other Mutual Funds in Australia. No, he doesn't show his broker statements but his results are audited by ASIC which is good enough for me. I know that some of you don't think much of ASIC, but I'm afraid that ASIC is the best this government can offer to protect its citizens. I am fully aware that ASIC is underfunded but they are doing the best they can with limited resources. They do, however, audit all Funds that hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL), so at least we are comparing apples with apples.
Whats the name of that fund and where are its results?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?